Three-level performance evaluation of high RAP asphalt surface mixes

Abstract To support an increased use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and innovative materials, appropriate laboratory performance tests are required. There exists a wide selection of performance tests with varying complexity, reliability, and cost. However, there is no consensus on which tests are best suited to support the design and quality assessment of asphalt mixtures. The main purpose of this effort was to assess the impact of testing complexity on the estimated performance of asphalt pavements through a comprehensive evaluation of four different highly recycled surface mixes produced and placed in Virginia. For that purpose, the research team defined a three-level testing framework herein referred to as basic, intermediate, and advanced. Each level was characterized by an increasing degree of complexity and cost and included tests to characterize both the cracking resistance and the rutting resistance of the evaluated mixtures. Under the performance evaluation process, it was possible to investigate the features of the various laboratory tests. Through the review of the theoretical background, the evaluation of the test procedures, and statistical analysis of the results, it was possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each test. Based on the test results, recommendations were provided on the design of highly recycled surface mixes. Also, it was possible to provide guidelines to develop appropriate quality assessment criteria and mix design methodology.

[1]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Laboratory Hot-Mix Asphalt Cracking Testing , 2013 .

[2]  C. Sangiorgi,et al.  The Challenges of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement for New Asphalt Mixtures: A Review , 2020, Materials.

[3]  L. Walubita,et al.  Comparative evaluation of five HMA rutting-related laboratory test methods relative to field performance data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTT , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[4]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  Fatigue Performance Prediction of Asphalt Pavements with FlexPAVETM, the S-VECD Model, and DR Failure Criterion , 2018 .

[5]  Haleh Azari.  Precision Estimates of AASHTO T 324, “Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)” , 2014 .

[6]  R J Cominsky,et al.  THE SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN MANUAL FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND OVERLAYS , 1994 .

[7]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters , 2016 .

[8]  F. Giustozzi,et al.  Effect of mixing time and temperature on cracking resistance of bituminous mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement material , 2017 .

[9]  Luis Fuentes,et al.  Correlating the HWTT laboratory test data to field rutting performance of in-service highway sections , 2020 .

[10]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Search for a Laboratory Test to Evaluate Crack Resistance of Hot-Mix Asphalt , 2011 .

[11]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  Implementation of a Performance-Based Mix Design System in Texas , 2014 .

[12]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  Overlay Tester: A Rapid Performance Related Crack Resistance Test , 2005 .

[13]  Lubinda F. Walubita,et al.  Comparison of flow number, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation , 2013 .

[14]  S. Diefenderfer,et al.  Assessment of cracking performance indices of asphalt mixtures at intermediate temperatures , 2020, International Journal of Pavement Engineering.

[15]  Tom Scullion,et al.  The Overlay Tester: A Sensitivity Study to Improve Repeatability and Minimize Variability in the Test Results , 2012 .

[16]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Testing Protocols to Ensure Performance of High Asphalt Binder Replacement Mixes Using RAP and RAS , 2015 .

[17]  Y. Richard Kim,et al.  Development of Stress Sweep Rutting (SSR) test for permanent deformation characterization of asphalt mixture , 2017 .

[18]  Audrey Copeland,et al.  High RAP Asphalt Pavements: Japan Practice-Lesson Learned , 2015 .

[19]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Analyzer for HMA Design , 1999 .

[20]  Frank Fee,et al.  Implementation of Performance-Based Specifications for Asphalt Mix Design and Production Quality Control for New Jersey , 2014 .

[21]  N. Dowling.  Mechanical Behavior of Materials: Engineering Methods for Deformation, Fracture, and Fatigue , 1993 .

[22]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Hot-Mix Asphalt Permanent Deformation Evaluated by Hamburg Wheel Tracking, Dynamic Modulus, and Repeated Load Tests , 2012 .

[23]  Ramon Bonaquist,et al.  INDIRECT TENSION STRENGTH AS A SIMPLE PERFORMANCE TEST , 2004 .

[24]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  Development of an IDEAL cracking test for asphalt mix design and QC/QA , 2017 .

[25]  C..  Effect of Temperature and Humidity on Fracture Energy of Concrete , 2022 .

[26]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .

[27]  Cheolmin Baek,et al.  Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model as Platform for Asphalt Concrete Fatigue Analysis , 2012 .

[28]  L. Walubita,et al.  Comparison of Fracture Cracking Parameters from Monotonic Loading Tests: Indirect Tension and Monotonic Overlay Tester Tests , 2016 .

[29]  Louay N. Mohammad,et al.  Fracture Resistance Characterization of Superpave Mixtures Using the Semi-Circular Bending Test , 2005 .

[30]  Adriana Martínez,et al.  Fénix Test , 2010 .

[31]  Rongzong Wu,et al.  Performance-Based Specifications: California Experience to Date , 2014 .

[32]  Benjamin Shane Underwood,et al.  Development of a rutting index parameter based on the stress sweep rutting test and permanent deformation shift model , 2020, International Journal of Pavement Engineering.

[33]  B. Underwood,et al.  Development of a fatigue index parameter, Sapp , for asphalt mixes using viscoelastic continuum damage theory , 2020, International Journal of Pavement Engineering.