Feedback enrichment analysis for transcription factor-target genes in signaling pathways

Feedback regulation plays an important role in the regulation of molecular processes. Although feedback regulatory mechanisms that generate potential-specific dynamic behavior, such as oscillation and switch-like activation, have been found, their significant contribution to the signal transduction system has not been fully explored. In this study, I focused on the feedback regulation of signal molecules like transcription factor (TF)-associated target genes controlled after transcription (named TF-target feedback genes). I statistically analyzed the static network of signal transduction pathways and TF-target feedbacks to investigate their presence in upstream signal molecules of TFs in 394 different cell types, including 146 primary cells, 111 tissues, and 137 cell lines. The directed network of signal transduction utilized pathways annotated in KEGG, and the TF-target genes estimated per individual cells were used. Feedback enrichment analysis of upstream signal molecules of TF was performed to investigate whether TF-target genes are upstream of their TF and form a feedback loop in signal transduction. The study revealed the difference in the number of TF-target feedbacks between cells, while each cell had at least 11 significant TF-target feedbacks and invariably involved the E2F transcription factor 4 feedback within the cell cycle. The findings suggest the possibility of the regulation of the TF-associated signal transduction by the TF itself at the transcription level.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Ultrasensitivity part II: multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors, and positive feedback. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[3]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[4]  Daniel Marbach,et al.  Tissue-specific regulatory circuits reveal variable modular perturbations across complex diseases , 2016, Nature Methods.

[5]  K. Tan,et al.  Understanding transcriptional regulatory networks using computational models. , 2016, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  Boris N. Kholodenko,et al.  Feedback regulation in cell signalling: Lessons for cancer therapeutics. , 2016, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[7]  Michio Hiroshima,et al.  Positive Feedback Within a Kinase Signaling Complex Functions as a Switch Mechanism for NF-κB Activation , 2014, Science.

[8]  Ryan Miller,et al.  WikiPathways: a multifaceted pathway database bridging metabolomics to other omics research , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Shining Ma,et al.  Constructing tissue-specific transcriptional regulatory networks via a Markov random field , 2018, BMC Genomics.

[10]  Cesare Furlanello,et al.  A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas , 2015 .

[12]  Susumu Goto,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  A. Ma,et al.  A20: linking a complex regulator of ubiquitylation to immunity and human disease , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[14]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[15]  T. Meehan,et al.  An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues , 2014, Nature.

[16]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[17]  Jin He,et al.  Direct, noncatalytic mechanism of IKK inhibition by A20. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[18]  H. Kurata,et al.  Long negative feedback loop enhances period tunability of biological oscillators. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[20]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Dual Delayed Feedback Provides Sensitivity and Robustness to the NF-κB Signaling Module , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Stefan Wiemann,et al.  KEGGgraph: a graph approach to KEGG PATHWAY in R and bioconductor , 2009, Bioinform..

[22]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central , 2008 .

[23]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Systematic dissection of regulatory motifs in 2000 predicted human enhancers using a massively parallel reporter assay. , 2013, Genome research.

[24]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[25]  Henning Hermjakob,et al.  The Reactome pathway Knowledgebase , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  A. Blais,et al.  Constructing transcriptional regulatory networks. , 2005, Genes & development.

[28]  Olga G. Troyanskaya,et al.  GOLEM: an interactive graph-based gene-ontology navigation and analysis tool , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[29]  M. Kool,et al.  A20/Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Induced Protein 3 in Immune Cells Controls Development of Autoinflammation and Autoimmunity: Lessons from Mouse Models , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[30]  Kentaro Inoue,et al.  Stimulus-Dependent Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Expression Prolongs the Duration of B Cell Signalling , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[31]  D. Baltimore NF-κB is 25 , 2011, Nature Immunology.

[32]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Pathway enrichment analysis and visualization of omics data using g:Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap , 2019, Nature Protocols.

[33]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Systematic discovery and characterization of regulatory motifs in ENCODE TF binding experiments , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  J. Tyson,et al.  Design principles of biochemical oscillators , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.