Consumers’ changing attitudes towards functional foods

Abstract In our earlier research, seven dimensions reflected consumers’ reported willingness to use functional foods. The aims of this study were (1) to further develop these attitude measurements into a shorter and more feasible format (2) to explore whether these shorter attitude scales predict consumers’ reported willingness to use functional products and (3) to monitor consumers’ attitudes towards functional foods over a period of 2.5 years. Two data sets were collected in 2002 and 2004 (n = 1156 and n = 1113, respectively). In 2002, seven dimensions observed in 2001 were partly merged and three measurements were constructed: Reward from using functional foods, Necessity for functional foods and Confidence in functional foods. When these were used for measuring consumers’ attitudes in 2004, four dimensions were found: Reward from using functional foods, Necessity for functional foods, Confidence in functional foods and Safety of functional foods. Changes in the factor structure indicate that the basis of the attitudes towards functional foods is not stable. Men and women did not differ in their attitudes towards functional foods. Minor differences between age and education groups were practically non-existent. In both data sets, the best predictors for willingness to use functional foods were the perceived reward and the necessity for such foods. The dimensions, however, predict reported behaviour differently depending on the target product. During the study, the influence of the perceived necessity on the willingness to use functional foods became weaker. The functional foods in Finland may be approaching the status of conventionally healthy foods.

[1]  G. Armstrong,et al.  Opportunities and constraints in the functional food market , 2003 .

[2]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Consumer acceptance of functional foods: socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants , 2005 .

[3]  Liisa Lähteenmäki,et al.  Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices , 2003 .

[4]  Jonas,et al.  Functional foods: Consumer perceptions in Denmark and England , 1998 .

[5]  Klaus Menrad,et al.  Market and marketing of functional food in Europe , 2003 .

[6]  A. Koster,et al.  Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory , 2004, Appetite.

[7]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[8]  S. Bhaskaran,et al.  Buyer beliefs, attitudes and behaviour: foods with therapeutic claims , 2002 .

[9]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Dimensions of novelty: a social representation approach to new foods , 2003, Appetite.

[10]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  The effects of information on sensory ratings and preferences: The importance of attitudes , 1991 .

[11]  A. Diplock,et al.  Scientific Concepts of Functional Foods in Europe Consensus Document , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[12]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims , 2002 .

[13]  M. Lindeman,et al.  Impressions of functional food consumers , 2004, Appetite.

[14]  L. Lähteenmäki,et al.  Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods , 2004 .

[15]  Cecilia Mark-Herbert,et al.  Innovation of a new product category — functional foods , 2004 .

[16]  P. Pliner,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans , 1992, Appetite.

[17]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Preference for natural: instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines , 2004, Appetite.

[18]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Consumer acceptance of functional foods: issues for the future , 2003 .

[19]  K. Frayn,et al.  British Journal of Nutrition goes live , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[20]  R. Friele,et al.  Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of functional food consumers and dietary supplement users , 2003, British Journal of Nutrition.

[21]  Liisa Lähteenmäki,et al.  Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods , 2001 .

[22]  John A. Bower,et al.  Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit , 2003 .

[23]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Derived attributes as mediators between categorization and acceptance of a new functional drink , 2006 .

[24]  T. Mattila-Sandholm,et al.  Functional dairy products. , 2003 .

[25]  Anne Wilcock,et al.  Consumer attitudes, knowledge and behaviour: a review of food safety issues , 2004 .

[26]  L. Lähteenmäki,et al.  Strength of health‐related claims and their perceived advantage , 2003 .

[27]  K. Roininen,et al.  Quantification of Consumer Attitudes to Health and Hedonic Characteristics of Foods , 1999, Appetite.

[28]  Klaus G Grunert,et al.  The perceived healthiness of functional foods A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers' perception of functional foods , 2003, Appetite.