Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation.

Ultrasound-induced intracellular drug delivery, sonoporation, is an appealing and promising technique for next generation drug delivery system. Many types of molecules, such as plasmid DNAs, siRNAs and peptides, have been demonstrated to be delivered into the cell by ultrasound with the aid of microbubbles both in vitro and in vivo. Although there are many reports on in vitro sonoporation, the efficiency of successful sonoporation and the viabilities of cells after the procedure documented in each report vary in a wide range, and the reasons for these differences are not fully understood. In this study, we have investigated how different experimental settings would affect sonoporation efficiency and cell viabilities after the procedure. Our results show that the fashion of cell culture (e.g. in suspension or in monolayer culture) and the presence of standing wave have a great impact on the overall results. These results indicate that in vitro sonoporation settings should be carefully evaluated in each experiment. The fact that standing wave is necessary to achieve high sonoporation efficiency may be a problematic issue for clinical application of sonoporation, as it may be difficult (although not impossible) to create standing wave in a human body.

[1]  RyuichiMorishita,et al.  Local Delivery of Plasmid DNA Into Rat Carotid Artery Using Ultrasound , 2002 .

[2]  Y. Taniyama,et al.  Development of efficient plasmid DNA transfer into adult rat central nervous system using microbubble-enhanced ultrasound , 2004, Gene Therapy.

[3]  Ryuichi Morishita,et al.  Local delivery of E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using ultrasound with microbubble agent (Optison) inhibits intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in rat carotid artery model. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. , 2003, Radiology.

[5]  C. Porter,et al.  Spatial and acoustic pressure dependence of microbubble‐mediated gene delivery targeted using focused ultrasound , 2006, The journal of gene medicine.

[6]  Manabu Kinoshita,et al.  A novel method for the intracellular delivery of siRNA using microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Sonoporation: Mechanical DNA Delivery by Ultrasonic Cavitation , 2002, Somatic cell and molecular genetics.

[8]  Rajiv Chopra,et al.  Method for MRI-guided conformal thermal therapy of prostate with planar transurethral ultrasound heating applicators , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  I. Rivens,et al.  High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of rat tumours , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  R. Killiany,et al.  MRI‐guided focused ultrasound surgery in the brain: Tests in a primate model , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: effects of molecular size and acoustic energy. , 2002, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[13]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Shozo Sonoda,et al.  Gene transfer to corneal epithelium and keratocytes mediated by ultrasound with microbubbles. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Jeffrey C Bamber,et al.  Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  C. Cain,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  500‐element ultrasound phased array system for noninvasive focal surgery of the brain: A preliminary rabbit study with ex vivo human skulls , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  T. Ogihara,et al.  Transfection of NFκB-decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using efficient ultrasound-mediated gene transfer into donor kidneys prolonged survival of rat renal allografts , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[20]  木下 学 Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption , 2007 .

[21]  Ryuichi Morishita,et al.  Gene transfer into adult rat spinal cord using naked plasmid DNA and ultrasound microbubbles , 2005, The journal of gene medicine.

[22]  E. Shimoni,et al.  Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy , 2006, Gene Therapy.

[23]  Chris J Diederich,et al.  Thermal ablation and high-temperature thermal therapy: Overview of technology and clinical implementation , 2005, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[24]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: histological findings in rabbits. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Focal disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: a method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  Manabu Kinoshita,et al.  Intracellular Delivery of Bak BH3 Peptide by Microbubble-Enhanced Ultrasound , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[27]  稲垣 裕 Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated NF-κB decoy transfection attenuates neointimal formation after arterial injury in mice , 2008 .

[28]  R. Écochard,et al.  In vivo effects of high-intensity ultrasound on prostatic adenocarcinoma Dunning R3327. , 1992, Cancer research.

[29]  角田 聖 Sonoporation using microbubble BR14 promotes pDNA/siRNA transduction to murine heart , 2006 .

[30]  Chris J Diederich,et al.  MRI‐guided thermal therapy of transplanted tumors in the canine prostate using a directional transurethral ultrasound applicator , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[32]  Y. Taniyama,et al.  Ultrasound-Microbubble-Mediated NF-κB Decoy Transfection Attenuates Neointimal Formation after Arterial Injury in Mice , 2005, Journal of Vascular Research.

[33]  K Hynynen,et al.  The feasibility of using focused ultrasound for transmyocardial revascularization. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Narendra T. Sanghvi,et al.  Noninvasive surgery of prostate tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Focused ultrasound (HIFU) induces localized enhancement of reporter gene expression in rabbit carotid artery , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[36]  Wen-Zhi Chen,et al.  Feasibility of US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[37]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood-brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[38]  W J FRY,et al.  Ultrasonically produced localized selective lesions in the central nervous system. , 1955, American journal of physical medicine.

[39]  K. Anwer,et al.  Ultrasound enhancement of cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to primary tumors following systemic administration , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[40]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  F A Jolesz,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.