Managing flowering time in Miscanthus and sugarcane to facilitate intra- and intergeneric crosses

Miscanthus is a close relative of Saccharum and a potentially valuable genetic resource for improving sugarcane. Differences in flowering time within and between Miscanthus and Saccharum hinders intra- and interspecific hybridizations. A series of greenhouse experiments were conducted over three years to determine how to synchronize flowering time of Saccharum and Miscanthus genotypes. We found that day length was an important factor influencing when Miscanthus and Saccharum flowered. Sugarcane could be induced to flower in a central Illinois greenhouse using supplemental lighting to reduce the rate at which days shortened during the autumn and winter to 1 min d-1, which allowed us to synchronize the flowering of some sugarcane genotypes with Miscanthus genotypes primarily from low latitudes. In a complementary growth chamber experiment, we evaluated 33 Miscanthus genotypes, including 28 M. sinensis, 2 M. floridulus, and 3 M. ×giganteus collected from 20.9° S to 44.9° N for response to three day lengths (10 h, 12.5 h, and 15 h). High latitude-adapted M. sinensis flowered mainly under 15 h days, but unexpectedly, short days resulted in short, stocky plants that did not flower; in some cases, flag leaves developed under short days but heading did not occur. In contrast, for M. sinensis and M. floridulus from low latitudes, shorter day lengths typically resulted in earlier flowering, and for some low latitude genotypes, 15 h days resulted in no flowering. However, the highest ratio of reproductive shoots to total number of culms was typically observed for 12.5 h or 15 h days. Latitude of origin was significantly associated with culm length, and the shorter the days, the stronger the relationship. Nearly all entries achieved maximal culm length under the 15 h treatment, but the nearer to the equator an accession originated, the less of a difference in culm length between the short-day treatments and the 15 h day treatment. Under short days, short culms for high-latitude accessions was achieved by different physiological mechanisms for M. sinensis genetic groups from the mainland in comparison to those from Japan; for mainland accessions, the mechanism was reduced internode length, whereas for Japanese accessions the phyllochron under short days was greater than under long days. Thus, for M. sinensis, short days typically hastened floral induction, consistent with the expectations for a facultative short-day plant. However, for high latitude accessions of M. sinensis, days less than 12.5 h also signaled that plants should prepare for winter by producing many short culms with limited elongation and development; moreover, this response was also epistatic to flowering. Thus, to flower M. sinensis that originates from high latitudes synchronously with sugarcane, the former needs day lengths >12.5 h (perhaps as high as 15 h), whereas that the latter needs day lengths <12.5 h.

[1]  E. Sacks,et al.  Field Performance of Saccharum × Miscanthus Intergeneric Hybrids (Miscanes) Under Cool Climatic Conditions of Northern Japan , 2019, BioEnergy Research.

[2]  E. Sacks,et al.  Saccharum × Miscanthus intergeneric hybrids (miscanes) exhibit greater chilling tolerance of C4 photosynthesis and postchilling recovery than sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[3]  S. Sharma,et al.  Genetic mapping of biomass yield in three interconnected Miscanthus populations , 2018 .

[4]  S. Sharma,et al.  Can chilling tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus be transferred to sugarcane? , 2016 .

[5]  J. Juvik,et al.  Mapping the genome of Miscanthus sinensis for QTL associated with biomass productivity , 2015 .

[6]  M. Scarpari,et al.  Flowering of Sugarcane Genotypes under Different Artificial Photoperiod Conditions , 2015 .

[7]  Junhua Peng,et al.  Genetic structure of Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus sacchariflorus in Japan indicates a gradient of bidirectional but asymmetric introgression , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  S. Long,et al.  A footprint of past climate change on the diversity and population structure of Miscanthus sinensis. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  S. Creste,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GERMPLASM IN DEVELOPING AGRO-ENERGETIC PROFILE SUGARCANE CULTIVARS , 2014 .

[11]  I. Donnison,et al.  Flowering induction in the bioenergy grass Miscanthus sacchariflorus is a quantitative short-day response, whilst delayed flowering under long days increases biomass accumulation , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  J. Juvik,et al.  The Gene Pool of Miscanthus Species and Its Improvement , 2013 .

[13]  A. Paterson Genomics of the Saccharinae , 2013, Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models.

[14]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2 , 2013, R J..

[15]  DoKyoung Lee,et al.  A Simple System for Promoting Flowering of Upland Switchgrass in the Greenhouse , 2011 .

[16]  T. Ranney,et al.  Fertility and Reproductive Pathways in Diploid and Triploid Miscanthus sinensis , 2011 .

[17]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Characterization of flowering time diversity in Miscanthus species , 2011 .

[18]  A. Sugimoto,et al.  Effects of Day-length Treatment and Harvesting Time on the Flowering of Erianthus arundinaceus on Ishigaki Island, Japan , 2011 .

[19]  Adriana Cheavegatti-Gianotto,et al.  Sugarcane (Saccharum X officinarum): A Reference Study for the Regulation of Genetically Modified Cultivars in Brazil , 2011, Tropical Plant Biology.

[20]  Chris Somerville,et al.  Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels , 2010, Science.

[21]  N. Berding,et al.  Pursuing higher efficacy for managed photoperiodic initiation of sugarcane flowering in the tropics. , 2010 .

[22]  E. Lam,et al.  Improving sugarcane for biofuel: engineering for an even better feedstock , 2009 .

[23]  Steven R. Thomas,et al.  Herbaceous energy crop development: recent progress and future prospects. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[24]  K. Gravois,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SUGARCANE VARIETIES AT THE LSU AGCENTER , 2005 .

[25]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Reversal of dormancy in switchgrass with low-light photoperiod extension. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[26]  F. Miller,et al.  Registration of A3/B3 Cytoplasmic-Genetic Male-Sterile Sorghum Maturity and Height Parental Lines , 1999 .

[27]  Foster,et al.  Photoperiod control of gibberellin levels and flowering in sorghum , 1998, Plant physiology.

[28]  P. Moore,et al.  Chapter 7 - Flowering and Flower Synchronization , 1987 .

[29]  M. Julien Physiology of Flowering in Saccharum I. DAYLENGTH CONTROL OF FLORAL INITIATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN S. SPONTANEUM L. , 1973 .

[30]  C. Mcmillan,et al.  The Role of Ecotypic Variation in the Distribution of the Central Grassland of North America , 1959 .

[31]  G. B. Sartoris LONGEVITY OF SUGARCANE AND CORN POLLEN—A METHOD FOR LONG‐DISTANCE SHIPMENT OF SUGARCANE POLLEN BY AIRPLANE , 1942 .

[32]  H. M. Benedict Effect of day length and temperature on flowering and growth of four species of grasses. , 1940 .

[33]  M. Brannan International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists , 1938, Science.