Populations of the three major backbone conformations in 19 amino acid dipeptides

The amide III region of the peptide infrared and Raman spectra has been used to determine the relative populations of the three major backbone conformations (PII, β, and αR) in 19 amino acid dipeptides. The results provide a benchmark for force field or other methods of predicting backbone conformations in flexible peptides. There are three resolvable backbone bands in the amide III region. The major population is either PII or β for all dipeptides except Gly, whereas the αR population is measurable but always minor (≤ 10%) for 18 dipeptides. (The Gly φ,ψ map is complex and so is the interpretation of the amide III bands of Gly.) There are substantial differences in the relative β and PII populations among the 19 dipeptides. The band frequencies have been assigned as PII, 1,317–1,306 cm-1; αR, 1,304–1,294 cm-1; and β, 1,294–1,270 cm-1. The three bands were measured by both attenuated total reflection spectroscopy and by Raman spectroscopy. Consistent results, both for band frequency and relative population, were obtained by both spectroscopic methods. The β and PII bands were assigned from the dependence of the 3J(HN,Hα) coupling constant (known for all 19 dipeptides) on the relative β population. The PII band assignment agrees with one made earlier from Raman optical activity data. The temperature dependences of the relative β and PII populations fit the standard model with Boltzmann-weighted energies for alanine and leucine between 30 and 60 °C.

[1]  K. Kopple,et al.  Solvent-dependent conformational distributions of some dipeptides , 1980 .

[2]  F. Toma,et al.  Local interactions in peptides. 1H-1H, 13C-H coupling constants and calculations for the conformational analysis of N-acetyl-N'-methylamides of aliphatic amino acids. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[3]  Christopher M. Dobson,et al.  The effects of guanidine hydrochloride on the ’random coil‘ conformations and NMR chemical shifts of the peptide series GGXGG , 1997, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[4]  C. Dobson,et al.  NMR analysis of main-chain conformational preferences in an unfolded fibronectin-binding protein. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  George D Rose,et al.  Polyproline II structure in a sequence of seven alanine residues , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. Hermans,et al.  Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine “dipeptides” (Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution , 2003, Proteins.

[7]  Gerhard Stock,et al.  Conformational dynamics of trialanine in water. 2. Comparison of AMBER, CHARMM, GROMOS, and OPLS force fields to NMR and infrared experiments , 2003 .

[8]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Role of backbone solvation and electrostatics in generating preferred peptide backbone conformations: Distributions of phi , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[10]  Takashi Imai,et al.  Temperature and pressure effects on conformational equilibria of alanine dipeptide in aqueous solution. , 2004, Biopolymers.

[11]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Origin of the neighboring residue effect on peptide backbone conformation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Vibrational Raman optical activity characterization of poly(l-proline) II helix in alanine oligopeptides. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Abhishek K. Jha,et al.  Helix, sheet, and polyproline II frequencies and strong nearest neighbor effects in a restricted coil library. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[14]  Nicholas C Fitzkee,et al.  The Protein Coil Library: A structural database of nonhelix, nonstrand fragments derived from the PDB , 2005, Proteins.

[15]  Zhengshuang Shi,et al.  Neighbor effect on PPII conformation in alanine peptides. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  S. Bykov,et al.  Peptide secondary structure folding reaction coordinate: correlation between uv raman amide III frequency, Psi Ramachandran angle, and hydrogen bonding. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[17]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Intrinsic backbone preferences are fully present in blocked amino acids , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  George D Rose,et al.  Structures, basins, and energies: A deconstruction of the Protein Coil Library , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Simona Golic Grdadolnik,et al.  Determination of conformational preferences of dipeptides using vibrational spectroscopy. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[20]  R. Schweitzer‐Stenner Distribution of conformations sampled by the central amino acid residue in tripeptides inferred from amide I band profiles and NMR scalar coupling constants. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  H. Schwalbe,et al.  Intrinsic propensities of amino acid residues in GxG peptides inferred from amide I' band profiles and NMR scalar coupling constants. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.