Optimized support vector regression for drillingrate of penetration estimation

Abstract In the petroleum industry, drilling optimizationinvolves the selection of operating conditions for achievingthe desired depth with the minimum expenditurewhile requirements of personal safety, environment protection,adequate information of penetrated formationsand productivity are fulfilled. Since drilling optimizationis highly dependent on the rate of penetration (ROP), estimationof this parameter is of great importance duringwell planning. In this research, a novel approach called‘optimized support vector regression’ is employed for makinga formulation between input variables and ROP. Algorithmsused for optimizing the support vector regressionare the genetic algorithm (GA) and the cuckoo search algorithm(CS). Optimization implementation improved thesupport vector regression performance by virtue of selectingproper values for its parameters. In order to evaluatethe ability of optimization algorithms in enhancing SVRperformance, their results were compared to the hybridof pattern search and grid search (HPG) which is conventionallyemployed for optimizing SVR. The results demonstratedthat the CS algorithm achieved further improvementon prediction accuracy of SVR compared to the GAand HPG as well. Moreover, the predictive model derivedfrom back propagation neural network (BPNN), which isthe traditional approach for estimating ROP, is selectedfor comparisons with CSSVR. The comparative results revealedthe superiority of CSSVR. This study inferred thatCSSVR is a viable option for precise estimation of ROP.

[1]  M. Reza Rezaee,et al.  Petrophysical data prediction from seismic attributes using committee fuzzy inference system , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Prediction of Crude Oil Asphaltene Precipitation Using Support Vector Regression , 2014 .

[3]  Amar Khoukhi,et al.  Rate of Penetration Prediction and Optimization using Advances in Artificial Neural Networks, a Comparative Study , 2012, IJCCI.

[4]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Fuzzy Assessment of Asphaltene Stability in Crude Oils , 2014 .

[5]  Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.  A New Approach for the Prediction of Rate of Penetration (ROP) Values , 1997 .

[6]  Hamid Reza Ansari,et al.  Use seismic colored inversion and power law committee machine based on imperial competitive algorithm for improving porosity prediction in a heterogeneous reservoir , 2014 .

[7]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Asphaltene precipitation of titration data modeling through committee machine with stochastically optimized fuzzy logic and optimized neural network , 2014 .

[8]  Hadi Fattahi,et al.  Estimation of asphaltene precipitation from titration data: a hybrid support vector regression with harmony search , 2014, Neural Computing and Applications.

[9]  Keith K. Millheim,et al.  Applied Drilling Engineering , 1986 .

[10]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Renovating Scaling Equation Through Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Pattern Search Tool for Asphaltene Precipitation Modeling , 2014 .

[11]  Silvia Modesto Nassar,et al.  Optimization Models and Prediction of Drilling Rate (rop) for the Brazilian Pre-salt Layer , 2013 .

[12]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Support vector regression between PVT data and bubble point pressure , 2015, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[13]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Smart Determination of Difference Index for Asphaltene Stability Evaluation , 2014 .

[14]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Cuckoo Search via Lévy flights , 2009, 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC).

[15]  Toshinori Munakata,et al.  Fundamentals of the new artificial intelligence - beyond traditional paradigms , 2001, Graduate texts in computer science.

[16]  Mehdi Shahbazian,et al.  DRILLING RATE OF PENETRATION PREDICTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK: A CASE STUDY OF ONE OF IRANIAN SOUTHERN OIL FIELDS , 2012 .

[17]  Bahari Mohamad Hasan,et al.  INTELLIGENT DRILLING RATE PREDICTOR , 2011 .

[18]  Amin Gholami,et al.  How committee machine with SVR and ACE estimates bubble point pressure of crudes , 2014 .

[19]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Oil-CO2 MMP Determination in Competition of Neural Network, Support Vector Regression, and Committee Machine , 2014 .

[20]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning , 1995 .

[21]  A. Bahari,et al.  Drilling cost optimization in a hydrocarbon field by combination of comparative and mathematical methods , 2009 .

[22]  S. Kahraman,et al.  Drillability Prediction in Rotary Blast Hole Drilling , 2003 .

[23]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Discrete cuckoo search algorithm for the travelling salesman problem , 2014, Neural Computing and Applications.

[24]  Amin Gholami,et al.  Genetic optimization of neural network and fuzzy logic for oil bubble point pressure modeling , 2014, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering.

[25]  Mohamad Hasan Bahari,et al.  Drilling rate prediction using an innovative soft computing approach , 2010 .

[26]  Praveen Ranjan Srivastava,et al.  An Efficient Optimization Algorithm for Structural Software Testing , 2012 .

[27]  Oubay Hassan,et al.  Selected Engineering Applications of Gradient Free Optimisation Using Cuckoo Search and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2013 .

[28]  Amir Hossein Gandomi,et al.  Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems , 2011, Engineering with Computers.

[29]  Seyed Reza Shadizadeh,et al.  Modeling and Optimizing Rate of Penetration Using Intelligent Systems in an Iranian Southern Oil Field (Ahwaz Oil Field) , 2011 .

[30]  George R. Gray,et al.  Composition and Properties of Drilling and Completion Fluids , 1988 .

[31]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Cuckoo search: recent advances and applications , 2013, Neural Computing and Applications.