The Effect of Cleaning on Dust and the Health of Office Workers: An Intervention Study

Background: Office employees often experience symptoms that could be related to indoor air exposures. Methods: In an office building, 114 nonsmokers who had reported mucosal irritation complaints in a survey were selected to participate in a double-blind intervention study. The intervention was carried out in Oslo, Norway, during 1998. The offices of the intervention group were given a comprehensive cleaning, whereas the offices of the control group got a superficial cleaning as a placebo treatment. Dust concentration, health complaints, and nasal congestion were recorded before and after intervention or placebo. In the intervention group, the mean dust concentration was 67 &mgr;g/m3 before intervention and 50 &mgr;g/m3 after cleaning. Results: The intervention group reported a reduction in mucosal irritation complaints (a median reduction of 1.0 irritation index points on a scale 0–8) compared with no change in the control group. The odds ratio for reporting a 2-point reduction of the mucosal irritation symptom index was 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2–9.1) in the intervention group compared with the control group. Nasal congestion, measured by acoustic rhinometry, was also reduced in the intervention group. The odds ratio for reduction in nasal congestion above the 70th percentile was 4.2 (CI = 1.3–11) in the intervention group versus the control group Conclusions: This experimental field trial shows that comprehensive cleaning reduces the airborne dust in offices, and also can reduce mucosal symptoms and nasal congestion.

[1]  Jan Sundell,et al.  A Prevalence Study Of The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) And Facial Skin Symptoms In Office Workers , 1993 .

[2]  Peter Dingle,et al.  Particulate Matter Intervention Study: A Causal Factor of Building‐Related Symptoms in an Older Building , 1998 .

[3]  E. Söderman,et al.  Improved health after intervention in a school with moisture problems. , 2000, Indoor air.

[4]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in Office Workers and Facial Skin Symptoms among VDT‐Workers in Relation to Building and Room Characteristics: Two Case‐Referent Studies , 1994 .

[5]  L. Palmberg,et al.  House dust induces IL-6 and IL-8 response in A549 epithelial cells. , 1999, Indoor air.

[6]  Peder Wolkoff,et al.  Dust and the sick building syndrome , 1994 .

[7]  T. Mayhew,et al.  Validation of acoustic rhinometry by using the Cavalieri principle to estimate nasal cavity volume in cadavers. , 2007, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[8]  W Eduard,et al.  Methods for quantitative assessment of airborne levels of noninfectious microorganisms in highly contaminated work environments. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[9]  B. V. Pedersen,et al.  Influence of personal characteristics, job-related factors and psychosocial factors on the sick building syndrome. Danish Indoor Climate Study Group. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Cleaning methods, their effectiveness and airborne dust generation , 1994 .

[11]  P Wargocki,et al.  Subjective perceptions, symptom intensity and performance: a comparison of two independent studies, both changing similarly the pollution load in an office. , 2002, Indoor air.

[12]  V. Lund,et al.  The role of acoustic rhinometry in studying the nasal cycle. , 1993, Rhinology.

[13]  P. O'Flynn.  Posture and nasal geometry. , 1993, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  W Eduard,et al.  Symptoms prevalence among office employees and associations to building characteristics. , 2003, Indoor air.

[16]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  An Intervention Study of the Effect of Improved Cleaning Methods on the Concentration and Composition of Dust , 1998 .

[17]  T. Schneider,et al.  Challenges for indoor environment research in the new office. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  L. Kenny.  Developments in workplace aerosol sampling. A review. , 1996, The Analyst.

[19]  Lars Mølhave,et al.  Sensory and other neurogenic effects of exposures to airborne office dust , 2000 .

[20]  Gary J. Raw,et al.  Sick Building Syndrome: Cleanliness is Next to Healthiness , 1993 .

[21]  O Hilberg,et al.  Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. , 2000, Rhinology. Supplement.

[22]  James H. Vincent,et al.  Aerosol Science for Industrial Hygienists , 1995 .

[23]  Karin Foarde,et al.  Cleaning for Improved Indoor Air Quality: an Initial Assessment of Effectiveness , 1997 .

[24]  T Schneider,et al.  'EUROPART'. Airborne particles in the indoor environment. A European interdisciplinary review of scientific evidence on associations between exposure to particles in buildings and health effects. , 2003, Indoor air.

[25]  P. Malmberg,et al.  Collection of airborne micro-organisms on Nuclepore filters, estimation and analysis--CAMNEA method. , 1986, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[26]  A. Grøntved.  The clinical significance, diagnosis and treatment of bulla formation in the nose. , 1978, Rhinology.

[27]  J. Colls,et al.  The Influence of Human Activity on the Vertical Distribution of Airborne Particle Concentration in Confined Environments: Preliminary Results , 1998 .

[28]  S K Kjaergaard,et al.  Effects on eyes and nose in humans after experimental exposure to airborne office dust. , 2000, Indoor air.

[29]  Dan Norbäck,et al.  Nasal Mucosal Swelling in Relation to Low Air Exchange Rate in Schools , 1997 .