Analytical Procedures and Audit‐Planning Decisions

This study examines auditors' decisions to revise preliminary audit plans after analytical procedures performed during interim testing reveal significant, unexpected fluctuations. We examine the effects of two variables on these decisions: (1) the presence or absence of an explicit incentive for management to misstate the financial statements, and (2) the degree to which management's explanation for the fluctuation is independently corroborated. We hypothesize that these two variables interact. Auditors will be more likely to increase their planned tests when there is minimal corroboration of management's explanation for the fluctuation and there is an explicit incentive for management to misrepresent the financial statements. The results of an experiment are consistent with this hypothesis. While our results suggest that auditors are more likely to revise audit plans in these conditions, we also find that a relatively high proportion of auditors do not revise their plans when faced with increased audit r...

[1]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[2]  D. Gilbert.  How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[3]  Alvin A. Arens,et al.  Study guide, seventh edition, auditing : an integrated approach {by] Arens [and] Loebbecke , 1997 .

[4]  G. Marchant,et al.  Justification Of Decisions In Auditing , 1995 .

[5]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[6]  Thomas Mehle.  Hypothesis Generation in an Automobile Malfunction Inference Task. , 1982 .

[7]  D. Eric Hirst,et al.  Auditor Sensitivity to Earnings Management , 1994 .

[8]  Mark F. Zimbelman.  The Effects of Sas No. 82 on Auditors' Attention to Fraud Risk Factors and Audit Planning Decisions , 1997 .

[9]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[10]  D. Eric Hirst,et al.  Audit Analytical Procedures: A Field Investigation* , 1996 .

[11]  Scott M. Smith,et al.  Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction , 1989 .

[12]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  The availability explanation of excessive plausibility assessments , 1981 .

[13]  Thomas Kida,et al.  The Impact of Analytical Review Results, Internal Control Reliability, and Experience on Auditors' Use of Analytical Review , 1989 .

[14]  Robert Libby,et al.  Experience And The Ability To Explain Audit Findings , 1990 .

[15]  William B. Swann,et al.  Confirmatory Search Strategies in Social Interaction: How, When, Why, and With What Consequences , 1987 .

[16]  Barry L. Lewis,et al.  Determinants of Auditor Expertise , 1990 .