Quantifying Resolution Sensitivity of Spatial Autocorrelation: A Resolution Correlogram Approach

Raster spatial datasets are often analyzed at multiple spatial resolutions to understand natural phenomena such as global climate and land cover patterns. Given such datasets, a collection of user defined resolutions and a neighborhood definition, resolution sensitivity analysis (RSA) quantifies the sensitivity of spatial autocorrelation across different resolutions. RSA is important due to applications such as land cover assessment where it may help to identify appropriate aggregations levels to detect patch sizes of different land cover types. However, Quantifying resolution sensitivity of spatial autocorrelation is challenging for two important reasons: (a) absence of a multi-resolution definition for spatial autocorrelation and (b) possible non-monotone sensitivity of spatial autocorrelation across resolutions. Existing work in spatial analysis (e.g. distance based correlograms) focuses on purely graphical methods and analyzes the distance-sensitivity of spatial autocorrelation. In contrast, this paper explores quantitative methods in addition to graphical methods for RSA. Specifically, we formalize the notion of resolution correlograms(RCs) and present new tools for RSA, namely, rapid change resolution (RCR) detection and stable resolution interval (SRI) detection. We propose a new RSA algorithm that computes RCs, discovers interesting RCRs and SRIs. A case study using a vegetation cover dataset from Africa demonstrates the real world applicability of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Wavelets in Geophysics , 1994 .

[2]  A. Willsky Multiresolution Markov models for signal and image processing , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications, edited by M.M. Fischer and A. Getis , 2011 .

[4]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models , 2003 .

[5]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Under the hood , 2002 .

[6]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis , 2010 .

[7]  David Ebdon,et al.  Statistics in geography , 1986 .

[8]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  Multi - scale modelling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador , 1999 .

[9]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS , 2023 .

[10]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  Land use in Ecuador: a statistical analysis at different aggregation levels , 1998 .

[11]  R. Geary,et al.  The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping , 1954 .

[12]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Spatial Scale Problems and Geostatistical Solutions: A Review , 2000 .

[14]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  Discovering interesting sub-paths in spatiotemporal datasets: a summary of results , 2011, GIS.

[15]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  On the choice of spatial and categorical scale in remote sensing land cover classification , 2005 .

[16]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Wavelet Analysis in Geophysics: An Introduction , 1994 .

[17]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[18]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[19]  P. Moran The Interpretation of Statistical Maps , 1948 .

[20]  M. Goodchild The Validity and Usefulness of Laws in Geographic Information Science and Geography , 2004 .

[21]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .