Can We Use Satellite-Based Soil-Moisture Products at High Resolution to Investigate Land-Use Differences and Land-Atmosphere Interactions? A Case Study in the Savanna

The use of soil moisture (SM) measurements from satellites has grown in recent years, fostering the development of new products at high resolution. This opens the possibility of using them for certain applications that were normally carried out using in situ data. We investigated this hypothesis through two main analyses using two high-resolution satellite-based soil moisture (SBSM) products that combined microwave with thermal and optical data: (1) The Disaggregation based on Physical And Theoretical scale Change (DISPATCH) and, (2) The Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity-Barcelona Expert Center (SMOS-BEC Level 4). We used these products to analyse the SM differences among pixels with contrasting vegetation. This was done through the comparison of the SM measurements from satellites and the measurements simulated with a simple antecedent precipitation index (API) model, which did not account for the surface characteristics. Subsequently, the deviation of the SM from satellite with respect to the API model (bias) was analysed and compared for contrasting land use categories. We hypothesised that the differences in the biases of the varied categories could provide information regarding the water retention capacity associated with each type of vegetation. From the satellite measurements, we determined how the SM depended on the tree cover, i.e., the denser the tree cover, the higher the SM. However, in winter periods with light rain events, the tree canopy could dampen the moistening of the soil through interception and conducted higher SM in the open areas. This evolution of the SM differences that depended on the characteristics of each season was observed both from satellite and from in situ measurements taken beneath a tree and in grass on the savanna landscape. The agreement between both types of measurements highlighted the potential of the SBSM products to investigate the SM of each type of vegetation. We found that the results were clearer for DISPATCH, whose data was not smoothed spatially as it was in SMOS-BEC. We also tested whether the relationships between SM and evapotranspiration could be investigated using satellite data. The answer to this question was also positive but required removing the unrealistic high-frequency SM oscillations from the satellite data using a low pass filter. This improved the performance scores of the products and the agreement with the results from the in situ data. These results demonstrated the possibility of using SM data from satellites to substitute ground measurements for the study of land-atmosphere interactions, which encourages efforts to improve the quality and resolution of these measurements.

[1]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Correcting satellite-based precipitation products through SMOS soil moisture data assimilation in two land-surface models of different complexity: API and SURFEX , 2017 .

[2]  Ahmad Al Bitar,et al.  SMOS disaggregated soil moisture product at 1 km resolution: Processor overview and first validation results , 2016, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[3]  José Manuel Gutiérrez,et al.  Update of the Spain02 gridded observational dataset for EURO‐CORDEX evaluation: assessing the effect of the interpolation methodology , 2016 .

[4]  C. Gruhier,et al.  A simple and effective method for correcting soil moisture and precipitation estimates using AMSR-E measurements , 2013 .

[5]  M. Budyko The heat balance of the earth's surface , 1958 .

[6]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Evaluation of different downscaling techniques for hydrological climate-change impact studies at the catchment scale , 2011 .

[7]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia , 2016 .

[8]  V. Castillo,et al.  Spatial patterns and temporal stability of soil moisture across a range of scales in a semi‐arid environment , 2000 .

[9]  Alexandre Bouvet,et al.  Understanding the temporal behavior of crops using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2-like data for agricultural applications , 2017 .

[10]  J. Qu,et al.  Satellite remote sensing applications for surface soil moisture monitoring: A review , 2009 .

[11]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[12]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Simultaneous assimilation of SMOS soil moisture and atmospheric CO2 in-situ observations to constrain the global terrestrial carbon cycle , 2016 .

[13]  D. Gautam,et al.  A Review of Current and Potential Applications of Remote Sensing to Study the Water Status of Horticultural Crops , 2020, Agronomy.

[14]  Luciano Mateos,et al.  Effect of the differences in spectral response of Mediterranean tree canopies on the estimation of evapotranspiration using vegetation index-based crop coefficients , 2020 .

[15]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture: Addressing the monitoring at the catchment scale , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[16]  W. Wagner,et al.  Fusion of active and passive microwave observations to create an Essential Climate Variable data record on soil moisture , 2012 .

[17]  C. Jones,et al.  Direct soil moisture controls of future global soil carbon changes: An important source of uncertainty , 2011 .

[18]  F. Lohou,et al.  Estimation of the advection effects induced by surface heterogeneities in the surface energy budget , 2016 .

[19]  J. Pereira,et al.  Rainfall interception by an isolated evergreen oak tree in a Mediterranean savannah , 2006 .

[20]  S. Wilson,et al.  Competitive effects of shrubs and grasses in prairie , 2000 .

[21]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake , 2018, Nature.

[22]  Abdou Ali,et al.  Using spaceborne surface soil moisture to constrain satellite precipitation estimates over West Africa , 2008 .

[23]  Yann Kerr,et al.  The Precipitation Inferred from Soil Moisture (PrISM) Near Real-Time Rainfall Product: Evaluation and Comparison , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  G. McPherson,et al.  Spatial and temporal soil moisture resource partitioning by trees and grasses in a temperate savanna, Arizona, USA , 1997, Oecologia.

[26]  Ahmad Al Bitar,et al.  Self-calibrated evaporation-based disaggregation of SMOS soil moisture: An evaluation study at 3 km and 100 m resolution in Catalunya, Spain , 2013 .

[27]  B. Fu,et al.  Temporal stability of soil moisture under different land uses/cover in the Loess Plateau based on a finer spatiotemporal scale , 2013 .

[28]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  Impact of the ECMWF reanalysis soil water on forecasts of the July 1993 Mississippi flood , 1999 .

[29]  A. Al Bitar,et al.  Overview of SMOS performance in terms of global soil moisture monitoring after six years in operation , 2016 .

[30]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy , 2007 .

[31]  Estrella Olmedo,et al.  Long-term SMOS soil moisture products: A comprehensive evaluation across scales and methods in the Duero Basin (Spain) , 2015 .

[32]  José M. Gutiérrez,et al.  Observational uncertainty and regional climate model evaluation: A pan‐European perspective , 2019 .

[33]  Ahmad Al Bitar,et al.  Comparison Between SMOS, VUA, ASCAT, and ECMWF Soil Moisture Products Over Four Watersheds in U.S. , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[34]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[35]  Adriano Camps,et al.  A Spatially Consistent Downscaling Approach for SMOS Using an Adaptive Moving Window , 2018, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Arnaud Carrara,et al.  Modeling Surface Energy Fluxes over a Dehesa (Oak Savanna) Ecosystem Using a Thermal Based Two-Source Energy Balance Model (TSEB) I , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[37]  Arnaud Carrara,et al.  Modeling Surface Energy Fluxes over a Dehesa (Oak Savanna) Ecosystem Using a Thermal Based Two Source Energy Balance Model (TSEB) II - Integration of Remote Sensing Medium and Low Spatial Resolution Satellite Images , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[38]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of climate‐soil‐vegetation dynamies , 2000 .

[39]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Millet yield estimates in the Sahel using satellite derived soil moisture time series , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[40]  Thierry Pellarin,et al.  Hydrological modelling and associated microwave emission of a semi-arid region in South-western Niger , 2009 .

[41]  E. Wood,et al.  Observed Land–Atmosphere Coupling from Satellite Remote Sensing and Reanalysis , 2011 .

[42]  Adriano Camps,et al.  On the synergy of SMOS and Terra/Aqua MODIS: High resolution soil moisture maps in near real-time , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[43]  Yann Kerr,et al.  An overview of HAPEX-Sahel: a study in climate and desertification. , 1997 .

[44]  Scott D. Wilson,et al.  Temporal heterogeneity of soil moisture in grassland and forest , 2003 .

[45]  C. White,et al.  Relationships between climate variability, soil moisture, and Australian heatwaves , 2015 .

[46]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[47]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[48]  G. Moreno,et al.  The Functioning, Management and Persistence of Dehesas , 2009 .

[49]  Javier Lozano-Parra,et al.  The role of vegetation covers on soil wetting processes at rainfall event scale in scattered tree woodland of Mediterranean climate , 2015 .

[50]  S. Rambal,et al.  Soil water improvement by trees in the rangelands of southern Spain , 1988 .

[51]  M. Hugh-jones,et al.  Modeling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax disease, for the contiguous United States using predictive ecological [corrected] niche modeling. , 2007, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.