Performance of e-ASPECTS software in comparison to that of stroke physicians on assessing CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients

Background The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) is an established 10-point quantitative topographic computed tomography scan score to assess early ischemic changes. We compared the performance of the e-ASPECTS software with those of stroke physicians at different professional levels. Methods The baseline computed tomography scans of acute stroke patients, in whom computed tomography and diffusion-weighted imaging scans were obtained less than two hours apart, were retrospectively scored by e-ASPECTS as well as by three stroke experts and three neurology trainees blinded to any clinical information. The ground truth was defined as the ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted imaging scored by another two non-blinded independent experts on consensus basis. Sensitivity and specificity in an ASPECTS region-based and an ASPECTS score-based analysis as well as receiver-operating characteristic curves, Bland–Altman plots with mean score error, and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated. Comparisons were made between the human scorers and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging being the ground truth. Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis. Results In total, 34 patients were included and 680 (34 × 20) ASPECTS regions were scored. Mean time from onset to computed tomography was 172 ± 135 min and mean time difference between computed tomographyand magnetic resonance imaging was 41 ± 31 min. The region-based sensitivity (46.46% [CI: 30.8;62.1]) of e-ASPECTS was better than three trainees and one expert (p ≤ 0.01) and not statistically different from another two experts. Specificity (94.15% [CI: 91.7;96.6]) was lower than one expert and one trainee (p < 0.01) and not statistically different to the other four physicians. e-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.44 (experts: 0.38 ± 0.08 and trainees: 0.19 ± 0.05) and the lowest mean score error of 0.56 (experts: 1.44 ± 1.79 and trainees: 1.97 ± 2.12). Conclusion e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of stroke experts in the assessment of brain computed tomographys of acute ischemic stroke patients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.

[1]  R. Bhavani,et al.  Computer aided detection of ischemic stroke using segmentation and texture features , 2013 .

[2]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[3]  M. L. Lauzon,et al.  Atlas-Based Topographical Scoring for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[4]  P. Box.  Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data:a tutorial , 2013 .

[5]  K. Kimura,et al.  DWI-ASPECTS as a Predictor of Dramatic Recovery After Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration in Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion , 2013, Stroke.

[6]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. , 2000, Lancet.

[7]  H. Moriwaki,et al.  Extremely Early Computed Tomography Signs in Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke as a Predictor of Parenchymal Hematoma , 2008, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[8]  Artur Przelaskowski,et al.  Improved early stroke detection: Wavelet-based perception enhancement of computerized tomography exams , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[9]  K Minematsu,et al.  Pretreatment ASPECTS on DWI predicts 3-month outcome following rt-PA , 2010, Neurology.

[10]  A. Buchan,et al.  Selection of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients for Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis With Pro-Urokinase by Using ASPECTS , 2003, Stroke.

[11]  K. Kimura,et al.  Comparison of CT and DWI findings in ischemic stroke patients within 3 hours of onset. , 2014, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[12]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms ( Review , 2022 .

[13]  Douglas K. S. Ng,et al.  An image feature approach for computer-aided detection of ischemic stroke , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy , 2000, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Demchuk,et al.  ASPECTS and other neuroimaging scores in the triage and prediction of outcome in acute stroke patients. , 2011, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[16]  C. Sorensen,et al.  Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke , 2015 .

[17]  HiroshiYamagami,et al.  Early Ischemic Change on CT Versus Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Patients With Stroke Receiving Intravenous Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Therapy , 2011 .