Modeling the effect of photosynthetic vegetation properties on the NDVI--LAI relationship.

Developing a relationship between the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the leaf area index (LAI) is essential to describe the pattern of spatial or temporal variation in LAI that controls carbon, water, and energy exchange in many ecosystem process models. Photosynthetic vegetation (PV) properties can affect the estimation of LAI, but no models integrate the effects of multiple species. We developed four alternative NDVI-LAI models, three of which integrate PV effects: no PV effects, leaf-level effects, canopy-level effects, and effects at both levels. The models were fit to data across the natural range of variation in NDVI for a widespread High Arctic ecosystem. The weight of evidence supported the canopy-level model (Akaike weight, wr = 0.98), which includes species-specific canopy coefficients that primarily scale fractional PV cover to LAI by accounting for the area of unexposed PV. Modeling the canopy-level effects improved prediction of LAI (R2 = 0.82) over the model with no PV effect (R2 = 0.71) across the natural range of variation in NDVI but did not affect the site-level estimate of LAI. Satellite-based methods to estimate species composition, a variable in the model, will need to be developed. We expect that including the effects of PV properties in NDVI-LAI models will improve prediction of LAI where species composition varies across space or changes over time.

[1]  J. Chen,et al.  Retrieving Leaf Area Index of Boreal Conifer Forests Using Landsat TM Images , 1996 .

[2]  C. J. Tucker,et al.  Spectral assessment of soybean leaf area and leaf biomass , 1980 .

[3]  H. Gausman,et al.  LEAF REFLECTANCE OF NEAR-INFRARED , 1974 .

[4]  G. Asrar,et al.  Estimating Absorbed Photosynthetic Radiation and Leaf Area Index from Spectral Reflectance in Wheat1 , 1984 .

[5]  T. Carlson,et al.  Thermal remote sensing of surface soil water content with partial vegetation cover for incorporation into climate models , 1995 .

[6]  R. Waring,et al.  The normalized difference vegetation index of small Douglas-fir canopies with varying chlorophyll concentrations , 1994 .

[7]  E. B. Knipling.  Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation , 1970 .

[8]  Darrel L. Williams.  A comparison of spectral reflectance properties at the needle, branch, and canopy level for selected Conifer species , 1991 .

[9]  B. Bouman,et al.  Accuracy of estimating the leaf area index from vegetation indices derived from crop reflectance characteristics, a simulation study , 1992 .

[10]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[11]  U. Molau,et al.  Responses of Dryas octopetala to ITEX environmental manipulations: a synthesis with circumpolar comparisons , 1997 .

[12]  T. Callaghan,et al.  PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AT A HIGH ARCTIC POLAR SEMI-DESERT , 1998 .

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[14]  G. Asner.  Biophysical and Biochemical Sources of Variability in Canopy Reflectance , 1998 .

[15]  R. Colombo,et al.  Retrieval of leaf area index in different vegetation types using high resolution satellite data , 2003 .

[16]  J. Clevers.  The Derivation of a Simplified Reflectance Model for the Estimation of Leaf Area Index , 1988 .

[17]  S. Running,et al.  Remote Sensing of Coniferous Forest Leaf Area , 1986 .

[18]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Estimating the leaf area index of North Central Wisconsin forests using the landsat thematic mapper , 1997 .

[19]  G. Suits.  The calculation of the directional reflectance of a vegetative canopy , 1971 .

[20]  D. Turner,et al.  Integrating Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Process Models for Landscape- to Regional-Scale Analysis of the Carbon Cycle , 2004 .

[21]  C. Tucker.  Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[22]  N. U. Ahmed,et al.  Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations , 1994 .

[23]  F. Baret,et al.  Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment , 1991 .

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[25]  E. Lemaster,et al.  Suits reflectance models for wheat and cotton: theoretical and experimental tests. , 1977, Applied optics.

[26]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Practical Use of the Information-Theoretic Approach , 1998 .

[27]  S. Coulson,et al.  Community assembly along proglacial chronosequences in the high Arctic: vegetation and soil development in north‐west Svalbard , 2003 .

[28]  W. Verhoef.  Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modelling: The SAIL model , 1984 .

[29]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity , 2001 .

[30]  C. Field,et al.  Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types , 1995 .

[31]  D. Roberts,et al.  Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties , 2004 .

[32]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .