Human elbow joint torque is linearly encoded in electromyographic signals from multiple muscles

When the central nervous system (CNS) develops a muscular activation pattern to accomplish a particular isometric task, it clearly uses information concerning the external task requirements. These task requirements serve as inputs to neural transformations that output muscular activations. However, the nature of the inputs is not exactly known. Electromyographic (EMG) signals from eight muscles spanning the human elbow, as well as the total joint torque, were collected during a submaximal isometric flexion/extension task at a single joint angle. The EMG data, without any torque information, were subjected to principal components analysis. We found that 98% of EMG data variation could be described by two principal components the first resembled the joint torque and the second resembled the sum of the EMG signals from all eight muscles. The findings suggest that the CNS encodes these two quantities during isometric tasks.

[1]  T. Kuo,et al.  Isokinetic elbow joint torques estimation from surface EMG and joint kinematic data: using an artificial neural network model. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  C L Vaughan,et al.  A neural network representation of electromyography and joint dynamics in human gait. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[4]  Arthur J. Riopelle,et al.  Linear and nonlinear oddity. , 1959 .

[5]  W Herzog,et al.  Dynamic muscle force predictions from EMG: an artificial neural network approach. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[6]  R. Stein,et al.  The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Kirsch,et al.  EMG-based prediction of shoulder and elbow kinematics in able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  M Solomonow,et al.  The EMG-force relationships of skeletal muscle; dependence on contraction rate, and motor units control strategy. , 1990, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  W. Herzog,et al.  Prediction of dynamic tendon forces from electromyographic signals: An artificial neural network approach , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  N. Zheng,et al.  An analytical model of the knee for estimation of internal forces during exercise. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Stan C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  D. A. Shreeve,et al.  An evaluation of optimization techniques for the prediction of muscle activation patterns during isometric tasks. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  W. Weijs,et al.  Motor coordination in a multi-muscle system as revealed by principal components analysis of electromyographic variation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  T S Buchanan,et al.  Estimation of muscle forces about the wrist joint during isometric tasks using an EMG coefficient method. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J. van den Berg,et al.  Linearity between the weighted sum of the EMGs of the human triceps surae and the total torque. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.