Recent Visual Experience Shapes Visual Processing in Rats through Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Response Enhancement

From an ecological point of view, it is generally suggested that the main goal of vision in rats and mice is navigation and (aerial) predator evasion [1-3]. The latter requires fast and accurate detection of a change in the visual environment. An outstanding question is whether there are mechanisms in the rodent visual system that would support and facilitate visual change detection. An experimental protocol frequently used to investigate change detection in humans is the oddball paradigm, in which a rare, unexpected stimulus is presented in a train of stimulus repetitions [4]. A popular "predictive coding" theory of cortical responses states that neural responses should decrease for expected sensory input and increase for unexpected input [5, 6]. Despite evidence for response suppression and enhancement in noninvasive scalp recordings in humans with this paradigm [7, 8], it has proven challenging to observe both phenomena in invasive action potential recordings in other animals [9-11]. During a visual oddball experiment, we recorded multi-unit spiking activity in rat primary visual cortex (V1) and latero-intermediate area (LI), which is a higher area of the rodent ventral visual stream. In rat V1, there was only evidence for response suppression related to stimulus-specific adaptation, and not for response enhancement. However, higher up in area LI, spiking activity showed clear surprise-based response enhancement in addition to stimulus-specific adaptation. These results show that neural responses along the rat ventral visual stream become increasingly sensitive to changes in the visual environment, suggesting a system specialized in the detection of unexpected events.

[1]  M. Quirk,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Is an NMDA-Independent Process Distinct from the Sensory Novelty Encoded by the Mismatch Negativity , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Matthijs Verhage,et al.  A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Olson,et al.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  M. Steinschneider,et al.  Searching for the Mismatch Negativity in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Monkey: Deviance Detection or Stimulus Specific Adaptation? , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Topographic Distribution of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation across Auditory Cortical Fields in the Anesthetized Rat , 2016, PLoS biology.

[6]  István Czigler,et al.  Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Kasper Vinken,et al.  Visual Categorization of Natural Movies by Rats , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Meister,et al.  Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli , 2013, Current Biology.

[10]  R. Vogels,et al.  Neurons in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex Show No Surprise Response to Deviants in Visual Oddball Sequences , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Stanley E Lazic,et al.  The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis? , 2010, BMC Neuroscience.

[12]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Sources of adaptation of inferior temporal cortical responses , 2016, Cortex.

[13]  E. Schröger,et al.  Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[14]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network Analysis of Corticocortical Connections Reveals Ventral and Dorsal Processing Streams in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  David S. Greenberg,et al.  Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion , 2013, Nature.

[19]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Statistical Learning Signals in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  H. P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Neural Representations of Natural and Scrambled Movies Progressively Change from Rat Striate to Temporal Cortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Johannes M. Mayrhofer,et al.  Tactile frequency discrimination is enhanced by circumventing neocortical adaptation , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Ben Vermaercke,et al.  Functional specialization in rat occipital and temporal visual cortex. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Zoccolan Invariant visual object recognition and shape processing in rats , 2015, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-down influences on visual processing , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Somatostatin Interneurons Control a Key Component of Mismatch Negativity in Mouse Visual Cortex. , 2016, Cell reports.

[27]  S. Solomon,et al.  Moving Sensory Adaptation beyond Suppressive Effects in Single Neurons , 2014, Current Biology.