This study compares the performance of five popular equal-area projections supported by Free and Open Source Software for Geo-spatial (FOSS4G)—Sinusoidal, Mollweide, Hammer, Eckert IV and Homolosine. A set of 21,872 discrete distortion vindicatrices were positioned on the ellipsoid surface, centred on the cells of a Snyder icosahedral equal-area grid. These indicatrices were projected on the plane and the resulting angular and distance distortions computed, all using FOSS4G. The Homolosine is the only projection that manages to minimise angular and distance distortions simultaneously. It yields the lowest distortions among this set of projections and clearly outclasses when only land masses are considered. These results also indicate the Sinusoidal and Hammer projections to be largely outdated, imposing too large distortions to be useful. In contrast, the Mollweide and Eckert IV projections present trade-offs between visual expression and accuracy that are worth considering. However, for the purposes of storing and analysing big spatial data with FOSS4G the superior performance of the Homolosine projection makes its choice difficult to avoid.
[1]
J. Paul Goode,et al.
THE HOMOLOSINE PROJECTION: A NEW DEVICE FOR PORTRAYING THE EARTH'S SURFACE ENTIRE
,
1925
.
[2]
K. Sahr,et al.
Geodesic Discrete Global Grid Systems
,
2003
.
[3]
Luís Moreira de Sousa.
Remaining gaps in open source software for Big Spatial Data
,
2018
.
[4]
Keith C. Clarke,et al.
Symbolization of Map Projection Distortion: A Review
,
2001
.
[5]
J. E. E. Craster.
Some Equal-Area Projections of the Sphere
,
1929
.
[6]
J. Snyder.
An Equal-Area Map Projection For Polyhedral Globes
,
1992
.
[7]
Jeong Chang Seong,et al.
The Sinusoidal Projection: A New Importance in Relation to Global Image Data
,
2002
.
[8]
Michael Dixon,et al.
Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone
,
2017
.