Targeting the farmer decision making process: A pathway to increased adoption of integrated weed management

Abstract The readily measured benefits of herbicides must be balanced against the risks imposed upon society, the environment, and the long-term sustainability of agricultural economies. Integrated weed management (IWM) approaches are one means to achieve this balance. The decision models of weed scientists and Ohio farmers were developed and compared to identify gaps in knowledge. The results indicate that farmers understand but do not practice IWM. The failure to adopt may be attributable to gaps in their understanding of the human role in weed dispersal, their focus on the risks associated with weeds without recognition of their ecological benefits, and the tendency to overlook risks associated with management. However, educators may also fail to promote IWM within the frame of farmers' experience and belief structure. Targeted communication efforts that address key misperceptions, and highlight the cost-effective nature of integrated approaches, may increase adoption of IWM and ultimately increase sustainability of the agro-ecosystem.

[1]  M. Gray,et al.  Survey of integrated pest management practices in Central Illinois , 1995 .

[2]  R. Swennen,et al.  Non-crop resources and the role of indigenous knowledge in semi-arid production of Mexico , 2007 .

[3]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Herbicide resistance: Impact and management , 1996 .

[4]  R. M. Goodman.  Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science , 2004 .

[5]  Maurizio Sattin,et al.  The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook. , 2000 .

[6]  Preventing noxious weed invasion. , 1996 .

[7]  L. Wax,et al.  Grower Acceptance of Economic Thresholds for Weed Management in Illinois , 1997, Weed Technology.

[8]  D. Lodge,et al.  Take a risk: Preferring prevention over control of biological invaders , 2007 .

[9]  W. S. Lee,et al.  Robotic Weed Control System for Tomatoes , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[10]  Douglas D. Buhler,et al.  Expanding the Context of Weed Management , 1999 .

[11]  P. Nowak,et al.  Adoption of Integrated Pest Management Tactics by Wisconsin Farmers1 , 2006, Weed Technology.

[12]  Jeffrey L. Gunsolus,et al.  A Risk Management Perspective on Integrated Weed Management , 1999, Expanding the Context of Weed Management.

[13]  Paul G. H. Engel,et al.  The Social Organization of Innovation: A Focus on Stakeholder Interaction , 1997 .

[14]  W. G. Johnson,et al.  Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds and Resistance Management Strategies: An Indiana Grower Perspective1 , 2006, Weed Technology.

[15]  N. Hooker,et al.  Perceptions and Beliefs about Weed Management: Perspectives of Ohio Grain and Produce Farmers , 2008, Weed Technology.

[16]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[17]  Rick Llewellyn,et al.  Social Costs of Herbicide Resistance: The Case of Resistance to Glyphosate , 2006 .

[18]  J. Cardina,et al.  The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution , 1997, Weed Science.

[19]  C. Mallory-Smith,et al.  Contributions of Weed Science to Weed Control and Management1 , 2004 .

[20]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[21]  N. Röling,et al.  Ecological Knowledge System , 1996 .

[22]  Peter R. Hobbs,et al.  Weed Management in Less Developed Countries , 2004 .

[23]  Joseph L Arvai.  Using risk communication to disclose the outcome of a participatory decision-making process: effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decisions. , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[25]  C. Swanton,et al.  Integrated Weed Management: The Rationale and Approach , 1991, Weed Technology.

[26]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[27]  Search Joe,et al.  Invisible Force: Farmers' Mental Models and How They Influence Learning and Actions , 2005 .

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  COMMUNICATING RISK TO THE PUBLIC , 1992 .

[29]  D. Pannell,et al.  Targeting key perceptions when planning and evaluating extension , 2005 .

[30]  Rick Llewellyn,et al.  Resistance and the herbicide resource: perceptions of Western Australian grain growers , 2002 .

[31]  Stefano Benvenuti,et al.  Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment , 2007 .

[32]  Frederick L. Kirschenmann,et al.  Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. , 2001 .

[33]  William Leiss,et al.  Mad Cows and Mother's Milk: The Perils of Poor Risk Communication , 1997 .

[34]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2001 .

[35]  P. Nowak,et al.  The human dimension of resource management programs , 2004 .

[36]  G. W. Cussans,et al.  Integrated weed management. , 1995 .

[37]  Search Joe.  Continuity and Change: Themes of Mental Model Development Among Small-Scale Farmers , 2006 .

[38]  S. Duke.  Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. , 2005, Pest management science.

[39]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[40]  Kenneth R. Foster,et al.  Science and the Precautionary Principle , 2000, Science.

[41]  Farmer perspectives on cropping systems diversification in northwestern Minnesota , 2003 .