Global wavefront sensing for extremely large telescopes

In ELTs the larger size of the aperture will translates into different categories of problems and different kind of solutions. The concept of Global Multi Conjugated Adaptive Optics is here introduced. In this, the wavefront sensing is extended to a much larger Field of View, practically limited by the telescope optics or optomechanics and by the limit given by the coverage of the metapupil at the highest altitude of interest. The correction of these layers is employed in a numerical fashion and the information is retrieved in order to compensate for a much limited Field of View. All this, being done in a layer oriented fashion, does allow for a simplified treatment of the Signal to Noise Ratio and to an estimate of the performances in the plot h vs. spatial scales where layers and the related Kolmogorov distributed turbulence are plotted. Once this information is retrieved it is fed back into the existing Deformable Mirror with a back-projection that allow for the most efficient way in terms of coverage of the spatial frequencies. The nature of the closed- vs open-loop of such an approach is also briefly discussed. The aim of a sky coverage and of performances getting closer or exceeding the ones provided by Laser Guide Stars can be at hands.

[1]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Adaptive optics with solely natural guide stars for an extremely large telescope , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[2]  B. Ellerbroek First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensatio , 1994 .

[3]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Layer oriented: science with MAD and beyond , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[4]  R. Ragazzoni,et al.  No Laser Guide Stars for adaptive optics in giant telescopes , 1999 .

[5]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  First light AO (FLAO) system for LBT: final integration, acceptance test in Europe, and preliminary on-sky commissioning results , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[6]  Domenico Bonaccini,et al.  Does the outer scale help adaptive optics or is Kolmogorov gentler , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[7]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  A compact design of a WFS for a natural guide star-based ELT adaptive optics system , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  A new linear optical differentiation wavefront sensor for laser tomography on ELTs , 2007 .

[9]  Roberto Ragazzoni Laser Guide Star Advanced Concepts: Tilt Problem , 2000 .

[10]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Adaptive optics for 100-m-class telescopes: new challenges require new solutions , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[11]  R. Ragazzoni,et al.  Sensitivity of a pyramidic Wave Front sensor in closed loop Adaptive Optics , 1999 .

[12]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Adaptive-optics corrections available for the whole sky , 2000, Nature.

[13]  E. Marchetti,et al.  Modal tomography for adaptive optics , 1999 .

[14]  Jacques M. Beckers,et al.  Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 1988 .

[15]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  How to break the FoV versus thickness rule in MCAO , 2010 .

[16]  R. Ragazzoni Pupil plane wavefront sensing with an oscillating prism , 1996 .

[17]  E. Fedrigo,et al.  Multiple field of view layer-oriented adaptive optics Nearly whole sky coverage on 8 m class telescopes and beyond , 2002 .

[18]  Stefan Hippler,et al.  PYRAMIR: Exploring the On-Sky Performance of the World’s First Near-Infrared Pyramid Wavefront Sensor , 2010 .

[19]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  On-sky test of the pyramid wavefront sensor , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[20]  R. Foy,et al.  Adaptive telescope with laser probe : isoplanatism and cone effect , 1990 .