Effect of surface roughness, wavelength, illumination, and viewing zenith angles on soil surface BRDF using an imaging BRDF approach

Compared to non-imaging instruments, imaging spectrometers (ISs) can provide detailed information to investigate the influence of scene components on the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of a mixed target. The research reported in this article investigated soil surface reflectance changes as a function of scene components (i.e. illuminated pixels and shaded pixels), illumination and viewing zenith angles, and wavelength. Image-based BRDF data of both rough and smooth soil surfaces were acquired in a laboratory setting at three different illumination zenith angles and at four different viewing zenith angles over the full 360° azimuth range, at an interval of 20°, using a Specim V10E IS (Specim, Spectral Imaging Ltd., Oulu, Finland) mounted on the University of Lethbridge Goniometer System version 2.5 (ULGS-2.5). The BRDF of the smooth soil surface was dominated by illuminated pixels, whereas the shaded pixels were a larger component of the BRDF of the rough soil surface. As the illumination zenith angle was changed from 60° to 45° and then to 30°, the shadowing effect decreased, regardless of the soil surface. Soil surface reflectance was generally higher at the backscattering view zenith angles and decreased continuously to forward scattering view zenith angles in the light principal plane, regardless of the wavelength, due to the Specim V10E IS seeing more illuminated pixels in the backscattering angles than in the forward scattering angles. Higher soil surface reflectance was observed at higher illumination and viewing zenith angle combinations. For both soil surface roughness categories, the BRDF exhibited a greater range of values in the near-infrared than at the visible wavelengths. This research enhances our understanding of soil BRDF for various soil roughness and illumination conditions.

[1]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Physical Mechanisms in Hyperspectral BRDF Data of Grass and Watercress , 1998 .

[2]  D. Peddle,et al.  A low-cost field and laboratory goniometer system for estimating hyperspectral bidirectional reflectance , 2006 .

[3]  Nick van de Giesen,et al.  Tillage and surface moisture effects on bare-soil albedo of a tropical loamy sand , 2006 .

[4]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  J. Hill,et al.  Using Imaging Spectroscopy to study soil properties , 2009 .

[6]  Klaus I. Itten,et al.  A field goniometer system (FIGOS) for acquisition of hyperspectral BRDF data , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  P. North,et al.  Analyzing the effect of structural variability and canopy gaps on forest BRDF using a geometric-optical model , 1997 .

[8]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[9]  T. Painter,et al.  Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and case studies , 2006 .

[10]  B. Muys,et al.  A Compact Laboratory Spectro-Goniometer (CLabSpeG) to Assess the BRDF of Materials. Presentation, Calibration and Implementation on Fagus sylvatica L. Leaves , 2007, Sensors.

[11]  S. Sommer,et al.  A fast canopy reflectance model to simulate realistic remote sensing scenarios , 2002 .

[12]  Michael Vohland,et al.  The Use of Laboratory Spectroscopy and Optical Remote Sensing for Estimating Soil Properties , 2010 .

[13]  H. Kaufmann,et al.  Preliminary analysis for soil organic carbon determination from spectral reflectance in the frame of the EU project DeSurvey , 2005 .

[14]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[15]  Ana Maria Tarquis,et al.  Shadow analysis of soil surface roughness compared to the chain set method and direct measurement of micro-relief , 2010 .

[16]  L. Ferreira,et al.  Surface roughness effects on soil albedo , 2000 .

[17]  William C. Snyder,et al.  BRDF models to predict spectral reflectance and emissivity in the thermal infrared , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  I. Herrmann,et al.  Soil surface illumination at micro-relief scale and soil BRDF data collected by a hyperspectral camera , 2010 .

[19]  Jerzy Cierniewski,et al.  Influence of soil surface roughness on soil bidirectional reflectance , 1997 .

[20]  Arnon Karnieli,et al.  A hemispherical-directional reflectance model as a tool for understanding image distinctions between cultivated and uncultivated bare surfaces , 2004 .

[21]  D. Deering,et al.  A sphere-scanning radiometer for rapid directional measurements of sky and ground radiance: The PARABOLA field instrument , 1984 .

[22]  P. Andrieux,et al.  Soil surface infiltration capacity classification based on the bi-directional reflectance distribution function sampled by aerial photographs. The case of vineyards in a Mediterranean area , 2005 .

[23]  Suzelle Barrington,et al.  Shadow analysis: A method for measuring soil surface roughness , 2008 .