Toward Effective Robot--Child Tutoring

Personalized learning environments have the potential to improve learning outcomes for children in a variety of educational domains, as they can tailor instruction based on the unique learning needs of individuals. Robot tutoring systems can further engage users by leveraging their potential for embodied social interaction and take into account crucial aspects of a learner, such as a student’s motivation in learning. In this article, we demonstrate that motivation in young learners corresponds to observable behaviors when interacting with a robot tutoring system, which, in turn, impact learning outcomes. We first detail a user study involving children interacting one on one with a robot tutoring system over multiple sessions. Based on empirical data, we show that academic motivation stemming from one’s own values or goals as assessed by the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) correlates to observed suboptimal help-seeking behavior during the initial tutoring session. We then show how an interactive robot that responds intelligently to these observed behaviors in subsequent tutoring sessions can positively impact both student behavior and learning outcomes over time. These results provide empirical evidence for the link between internal motivation, observable behavior, and learning outcomes in the context of robot--child tutoring. We also identified an additional suboptimal behavioral feature within our tutoring environment and demonstrated its relationship to internal factors of motivation, suggesting further opportunities to design robot intervention to enhance learning. We provide insights on the design of robot tutoring systems aimed to deliver effective behavioral intervention during learning interactions for children and present a discussion on the broader challenges currently faced by robot--child tutoring systems.

[1]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: An ethnographic study in real-world settings , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Ginevra Castellano,et al.  “I Know That Now, I’m Going to Learn This Next” Promoting Self-regulated Learning with a Robotic Tutor , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Richard S. Newman,et al.  Children's help-seeking in the classroom: the role of motivational factors and attitudes , 1990 .

[4]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[5]  A. E. Gottfried,et al.  Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Elementary and Junior High School Students. , 1985 .

[6]  Shirley L. Yu,et al.  The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning , 1996 .

[7]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Behavior of Tutoring Systems , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[10]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data , 2006 .

[11]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The Interplay of Robot Language Level with Children's Language Learning during Storytelling , 2015, HRI.

[13]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[14]  Helen Pain,et al.  Informing the Detection of the Students' Motivational State: An Empirical Study , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[15]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[16]  G. T. Jackson,et al.  Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system , 2013 .

[17]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Affective Personalization of a Social Robot Tutor for Children's Second Language Skills , 2016, AAAI.

[18]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  From real-time attention assessment to “with-me-ness” in human-robot interaction , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Ana Paiva,et al.  iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game , 2008, AAMAS.

[20]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Meta-Cognitive Strategy Instruction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: How, When, and Why , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Someone to Read with: Design of and Experiences with an In-Home Learning Companion Robot for Reading , 2017, CHI.

[22]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Construct Validation of a Strategy Model of Student Self-Regulated Learning , 1988 .

[23]  J. Greene,et al.  Adolescents' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes and Their Relation to Qualitative Mental Model Shifts While Using Hypermedia , 2006, ICLS.

[24]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Personalising game difficulty to keep children motivated to play with a social robot: A Bayesian approach , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.

[25]  B. Zimmerman Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[26]  P. Pintrich,et al.  "Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. , 1997 .

[27]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.

[28]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Multi-Armed Bandits for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2013, EDM.

[29]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[30]  Shaobo Huang,et al.  How to train your DragonBot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[31]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[32]  Lei Li,et al.  THE ROLE OF GOAL-ORIENTATION IN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING , 2001 .

[33]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Gordon Ellis,et al.  Grand challenges for engineering , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[35]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Higher Nonverbal Immediacy Leads to Greater Learning Gains in Child-Robot Tutoring Interactions , 2015, ICSR.

[36]  Lei Qu,et al.  Classifying Learner Engagement through Integration of Multiple Data Sources , 2006, AAAI.

[37]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Embodiment and Human-Robot Interaction: A Task-Based Perspective , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[38]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[39]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[40]  Vive Kumar,et al.  Supporting Self-Regulated Learning with gStudy Software: The Learning Kit Project ** , 2006 .

[41]  B. Zimmerman Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview , 1990 .

[42]  C. Dweck,et al.  Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Effects of Social Presence and Social Role on Help-Seeking and Learning , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[44]  L. Hamilton,et al.  Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning , 2015 .

[45]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Give Me a Break! Personalized Timing Strategies to Promote Learning in Robot-Child Tutoring , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[46]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[47]  S. Graf,et al.  Adaptive and Intelligent Web-Based Educational Systems , 2009 .

[48]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[50]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor , 2010, CHI.

[51]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Shaping productive help-seeking behavior during robot-child tutoring interactions , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[52]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[53]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Automated, Unobtrusive, Action-by-Action Assessment of Self-Regulation During Learning With an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2010 .

[54]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning , 2007 .

[55]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[56]  Zachary A. Pardos,et al.  Modeling Individualization in a Bayesian Networks Implementation of Knowledge Tracing , 2010, UMAP.

[57]  S. Gall,et al.  Chapter 2 Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning , 2007 .

[58]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement , 2005, AIED.

[59]  P. Pintrich The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[60]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[61]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[62]  A. Ryan,et al.  Help-seeking tendencies during early adolescence: An examination of motivational correlates and consequences for achievement , 2011 .

[63]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[64]  D. Solomon,et al.  Individual characteristics and children's performance in open and traditional classroom settings. , 1976 .

[65]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Affective Meta-Tutoring Project: How to motivate students to use effective meta-cognitive strategies , 2011, ICCE 2011.

[66]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: an introduction , 2007 .

[67]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system , 2011, Learning and Instruction.

[68]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[69]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  The Role of Self-Efficacy in Achieving Health Behavior Change , 1986, Health education quarterly.

[70]  Michel C. Desmarais,et al.  A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[71]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Emotion Sensors Go To School , 2009, AIED.

[72]  Relationship between Origin Climate, Perceived Responsibility, and Grades , 1981 .

[73]  Ginevra Castellano,et al.  Adaptive Robotic Tutors that Support Self-Regulated Learning: A Longer-Term Investigation with Primary School Children , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[74]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Personalizing Robot Tutors to Individuals’ Learning Differences , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[75]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Thinking Aloud with a Tutoring Robot to Enhance Learning , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[76]  S. Gall,et al.  Chapter 2: Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning , 1985 .

[77]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The effect of presence on human-robot interaction , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[78]  Sonia Chernova,et al.  Interactive Hierarchical Task Learning from a Single Demonstration , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[79]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Children learning with a social robot , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[80]  S. Harter A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. , 1981 .

[81]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement , 2012, CHI.