Should genes for non-syndromic hearing loss be included in reproductive genetic carrier screening: Views of people with a personal or family experience of deafness.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Archibald,et al. How should severity be understood in the context of reproductive genetic carrier screening? , 2023, Bioethics.
[2] W. Dondorp,et al. Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review , 2022, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[3] A. McNeill,et al. A qualitative interview study of the attitudes toward reproductive options of people with genetic visual loss , 2022, Journal of genetic counseling.
[4] L. Haverman,et al. Views of patients and parents of children with genetic disorders on population‐based expanded carrier screening , 2022, Prenatal diagnosis.
[5] M. Delatycki,et al. The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: A systematic review. , 2022, Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics.
[6] F. Boardman,et al. What is a ‘serious’ genetic condition? The perceptions of people living with genetic conditions , 2021, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[7] A. Archibald,et al. Ethical considerations in gene selection for reproductive carrier screening , 2021, Human Genetics.
[8] N. Leach,et al. Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) , 2021, Genetics in Medicine.
[9] A. Newson,et al. Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: From the Clinic to the Population , 2021, Public health ethics.
[10] L. Haverman,et al. Preconception expanded carrier screening: a focus group study with relatives of mucopolysaccharidosis type III patients and the general population , 2021, Journal of Community Genetics.
[11] F. Boardman. Attitudes toward population screening among people living with fragile X syndrome in the UK: ‘I wouldn’t wish him away, I’d just wish his fragile X syndrome away’ , 2020, Journal of genetic counseling.
[12] M. Delatycki,et al. Which types of conditions should be included in reproductive genetic carrier screening?: Views of parents of children with a genetic condition. , 2020, European journal of medical genetics.
[13] N. Laing,et al. Gene selection for the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (“Mackenzie’s Mission”) , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[14] L. Haverman,et al. Attitudes of relatives of mucopolysaccharidosis type III patients toward preconception expanded carrier screening , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[15] F. Boardman. Whose life is worth preserving? Disabled people and the expressivist objection to neonatology , 2020, Acta paediatrica.
[16] A. McNeill,et al. Views of adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome on reproductive choices , 2020, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[17] V. Braun,et al. Novel insights into patients' life-worlds: the value of qualitative research. , 2019, The lancet. Psychiatry.
[18] B. Knoppers,et al. The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification , 2019, Journal of Medical Ethics.
[19] K. Ormond,et al. Attitudes of people with inherited retinal conditions toward gene editing technology , 2019, Molecular genetics & genomic medicine.
[20] M. Hansson,et al. Values and value conflicts in implementation and use of preconception expanded carrier screening - an expert interview study , 2019, BMC Medical Ethics.
[21] K. Abbott,et al. Feasibility of couple-based expanded carrier screening offered by general practitioners , 2019, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[22] F. Boardman,et al. “I didn’t take it too seriously because I’d just never heard of it”: Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK , 2018, Journal of genetic counseling.
[23] M. Hansson,et al. “A perfect society”— Swedish policymakers’ ethical and social views on preconception expanded carrier screening , 2018, Journal of Community Genetics.
[24] F. Boardman,et al. How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening , 2018, Molecular genetics & genomic medicine.
[25] P. Borry,et al. A systematic analysis of online marketing materials used by providers of expanded carrier screening , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.
[26] D. Chitayat,et al. Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study , 2018, Journal of Genetic Counseling.
[27] F. Griffiths,et al. The role of experiential knowledge within attitudes towards genetic carrier screening: A comparison of people with and without experience of spinal muscular atrophy , 2017, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[28] A. Clarke,et al. Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments , 2017, Front. Public Health.
[29] I. Haque,et al. Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Reproductive Behaviors of At-Risk Couples , 2016, bioRxiv.
[30] A. Höglund,et al. Swedish healthcare providers’ perceptions of preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS)—a qualitative study , 2016, Journal of Community Genetics.
[31] H. Kayserili,et al. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening , 2016, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[32] A. Paepe,et al. Attitudes of cystic fibrosis patients and parents toward carrier screening and related reproductive issues , 2015, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[33] Mary E Norton,et al. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Feta , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[34] I. Haque,et al. Systematic Classification of Disease Severity for Evaluation of Expanded Carrier Screening Panels , 2014, PloS one.
[35] F. Boardman. Experiential knowledge of disability, impairment and illness: The reproductive decisions of families genetically at risk , 2014, Health.
[36] Bridget C. O’Brien,et al. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[37] F. Boardman. The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease. , 2014, Social science & medicine.
[38] M. Aitken,et al. “Did you find that out in time?”: New life trajectories of parents who choose to continue a pregnancy where a genetic disorder is diagnosed or likely , 2012, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[39] G. Loewenstein,et al. Are they really that happy? Exploring scale recalibration in estimates of well-being. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[40] I. Krantz,et al. Parental narratives on genetic testing for children with hearing loss: A qualitative inquiry , 2007, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[41] L. Gillam,et al. Attitudes to Genetic Testing for Deafness: The Importance of Informed Choice , 2006, Journal of Genetic Counseling.
[42] P. Ladd. Deafhood: A concept stressing possibilities, not deficits , 2005 .
[43] Norbert Schwarz,et al. Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[44] H. Lane. Ethnicity, ethics, and the deaf-world. , 2005, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.
[45] Janet K. Williams,et al. Toward a biopsychosocial model for 21st-century genetics. , 2005, Family process.
[46] Steven D. Edwards. Disability, identity and the “expressivist objection” , 2004, Journal of Medical Ethics.
[47] B. Knoppers,et al. Serious genetic disorders: can or should they be defined? , 2002, American journal of medical genetics.
[48] E. Parens,et al. Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations. , 1999, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.
[49] E. Parens,et al. The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and Recommendations. , 1999, The Hastings Center report.
[50] G. Albrecht,et al. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. , 1999, Social science & medicine.
[51] A. De Paepe,et al. Attitudes of European Geneticists Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening , 2017, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.
[52] M. Delatycki,et al. Clinical ethics: Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults , 2009 .
[53] P. Liamputtong. Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations. , 2009, Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals.
[54] V. Braun,et al. Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .