Actuation performance of fluidic origami cellular structure: a holistic investigation

Motivated by the sophisticated geometries in origami folding and the fluidic actuation principle in nastic plant movements, the concept of fluidic origami cellular structure was proposed for versatile morphing and actuation. The idea is to assemble tubular Miura-ori modules into a cellular architecture, and apply fluidic pressure to induce folding and hence actuation. Despite the promising potentials, the actuation capabilities of fluidic origami, such as free stroke and block force, are not elucidated. In particular, the effects of the thick facet material stiffness and pressure-sealing end caps are not understood. These gaps in our knowledge prevent the practical implementations of fluidic origami. Therefore, this study aims to address these issues by incorporating realistic considerations into the design, fabrication, and analysis of fluidic origami. We construct CAD models of the fluidic origami modules based on realistic design parameters to ensure that they can be fabricated via commercially accessible 3D printers while remaining pressure proof. We then use both simplified analytical methods, such as the equivalent truss frame model, and the more comprehensive finite element methods to examine the actuation performance. Comparing the results from these different methods can reveal the influences of end caps and thick facet material stiffness. Based on these insights, a customized generic algorithm is used to identify the optimal fluidic origami designs for fluidic actuation. It is found that an optimal folding angle exists to maximize the actuation capability, while the sector angle of Miura-ori can be tailored to effectively program the actuation performance.

[1]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  How the Venus flytrap snaps , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Samuel M. Felton,et al.  A method for building self-folding machines , 2014, Science.

[3]  Christian Hühne,et al.  Shape-variable seals for pressure actuated cellular structures , 2015 .

[4]  Erik D. Demaine,et al.  Geometric folding algorithms - linkages, origami, polyhedra , 2007 .

[5]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Bar and hinge models for scalable analysis of origami , 2017 .

[6]  Rui Peng,et al.  Origami of thick panels , 2015, Science.

[7]  Tomohiro Tachi,et al.  Rigid-Foldable Thick Origami , 2010 .

[8]  K W Wang,et al.  Fluidic origami with embedded pressure dependent multi-stability: a plant inspired innovation , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Robert J. Lang,et al.  A computational algorithm for origami design , 1996, SCG '96.

[10]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[11]  R. Barrett,et al.  Mechanics of pressure-adaptive honeycomb and its application to wing morphing , 2011 .

[12]  G. Paulino,et al.  Unraveling metamaterial properties in zigzag-base folded sheets , 2015, Science Advances.

[13]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Realization of Morphing Wings: A Multidisciplinary Challenge , 2012 .

[14]  Christian Hühne,et al.  Holistic design and implementation of pressure actuated cellular structures , 2015 .

[15]  Yue Chen,et al.  Fabricating biomedical origami: a state-of-the-art review , 2017, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[16]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Accommodating Thickness in Origami-Based Deployable Arrays , 2013 .

[17]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Rational design of reconfigurable prismatic architected materials , 2017, Nature.

[18]  K. W. Wang,et al.  Recoverable and Programmable Collapse from Folding Pressurized Origami Cellular Solids. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[19]  Robert J. Lang,et al.  Folding paper : the infinite possibilities of origami , 2013 .

[20]  Daniela Rus,et al.  An untethered miniature origami robot that self-folds, walks, swims, and degrades , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[21]  Mark Schenk,et al.  Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  D. Morse,et al.  Scaling Properties of Stretching Ridges in a Crumpled Elastic Sheet , 1995, Science.

[23]  Suyi Li,et al.  Plant-inspired adaptive structures and materials for morphing and actuation: a review , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  Keith A. Seffen,et al.  Review of Inflatable Booms for Deployable Space Structures: Packing and Rigidization , 2014 .

[25]  Victor Pan,et al.  The Beauty and Utility of DNA Origami , 2017 .

[26]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Topology-Optimized Design and Testing of a Pressure-Driven Morphing-Aerofoil Trailing-Edge Structure , 2013 .

[27]  Tomohiro Tachi,et al.  Origami tubes assembled into stiff, yet reconfigurable structures and metamaterials , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Tomohiro Tachi,et al.  Freeform Variations of Origami , 2010 .

[29]  Tomohiro Tachi,et al.  Programming curvature using origami tessellations. , 2016, Nature materials.

[30]  Kon-Well Wang,et al.  Fluidic origami: a plant-inspired adaptive structure with shape morphing and stiffness tuning , 2015 .

[31]  J. Dumais,et al.  “Vegetable Dynamicks”: The Role of Water in Plant Movements , 2012 .

[32]  Yoël Forterre,et al.  Slow, fast and furious: understanding the physics of plant movements. , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[33]  Hongbin Fang,et al.  Uncovering the deformation mechanisms of origami metamaterials by introducing generic degree-four vertices. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[34]  N. Kanzawa,et al.  Tyrosine phosphorylation in plant bending , 2000, Nature.