Prebiotic Competition between Information Variants, With Low Error Catastrophe Risks

During competition for resources in primitive networks increased fitness of an information variant does not necessarily equate with successful elimination of its competitors. If variability is added fast to a system, speedy replacement of pre-existing and less-efficient forms of order is required as novel information variants arrive. Otherwise, the information capacity of the system fills up with information variants (an effect referred as “error catastrophe”). As the cost for managing the system’s exceeding complexity increases, the correlation between performance capabilities of information variants and their competitive success decreases, and evolution of such systems toward increased efficiency slows down. This impasse impedes the understanding of evolution in prebiotic networks. We used the simulation platform Biotic Abstract Dual Automata (BiADA) to analyze how information variants compete in a resource-limited space. We analyzed the effect of energy-related features (differences in autocatalytic efficiency, energy cost of order, energy availability, transformation rates and stability of order) on this competition. We discuss circumstances and controllers allowing primitive networks acquire novel information with minimal “error catastrophe” risks. We present a primitive mechanism for maximization of energy flux in dynamic networks. This work helps evaluate controllers of evolution in prebiotic networks and other systems where information variants compete.

[1]  F. Dyson Origins of Life , 1985 .

[2]  Freeman J. Dyson,et al.  A model for the origin of life , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[3]  R. Rosen,et al.  On the dynamical realization of (M,R)-systems. , 1973, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  G. F. Joyce The antiquity of RNA-based evolution , 2002, Nature.

[5]  W. Gilbert Origin of life: The RNA world , 1986, Nature.

[6]  R. Popa,et al.  Energy-Driven Evolution of Prebiotic Chiral Order (Lessons from Dynamic Systems Modeling) , 2012 .

[7]  R. Popa,et al.  Biotic Abstract Dual Automata (BiADA): a novel tool for studying the evolution of porebiotic order (and the origin of life). , 2012, Astrobiology.

[8]  A. N. Pargellis,et al.  The evolution of self-replicating computer organisms , 1996 .

[9]  H Baltscheffsky Major "anastrophes" in the origin and early evolution of biological energy conversion. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Anas N. Al-Rabadi,et al.  A comparison of modified reconstructability analysis and Ashenhurst‐Curtis decomposition of Boolean functions , 2004 .

[11]  R. Popa,et al.  Analysis of competition between transformation pathways in the functioning of biotic abstract dual automata. , 2013, Astrobiology.

[12]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Open Problems in Artificial Life , 2000, Artificial Life.

[13]  Barry McMullin,et al.  SCL: An Artificial Chemistry in Swarm , 1997 .

[14]  C. Adami,et al.  Introduction To Artificial Life , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[15]  D. Penny,et al.  The Path from the RNA World , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  Eric Smith,et al.  The origin of the RNA world: co-evolution of genes and metabolism. , 2007, Bioorganic chemistry.

[17]  D. Deamer,et al.  Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life , 2005, Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres.

[18]  L W Buss,et al.  What would be conserved if "the tape were played twice"? , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Eigen Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.