Combining Psychophysical Measures of Discomfort and Electromyography for the Evaluation of a New Automotive Seating Concept

The purpose of this study was to determine if the advantages and disadvantages of a new automotive seating concept, known as the micro-adjuster control system, could be reliably evaluated using both a physiological assessment technique (i.e., electromyography [EMG]) and a subjective questionnaire. The results indicate that psychophysical measures of discomfort and the root mean squared (RMS) activity of the EMG are statistically related, r (8) = −.788, p = .020. More specifically, subjective perceptions of comfort were found to improve with decreasing levels of muscle activity. This implies that seat comfort can be evaluated on the basis of physiological as well as subjective responses to prolonged driving. This finding should drastically improve automobile seat design efforts.

[1]  H M Reynolds.  AUTOMOTIVE ERGONOMICS. CHAPTER 5. AUTOMOTIVE SEAT DESIGN FOR SITTING COMFORT , 1993 .

[2]  Kuntal Thakurta,et al.  Evaluating Short and Long Term Seating Comfort , 1995 .

[3]  D. Anton.  Occupational biomechanics , 1986 .

[4]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Some effects of lumbar support contour on driver seated posture , 1995 .

[5]  Robert P. Hubbard,et al.  THE USE OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY FOR SEAT ASSESSMENT AND COMFORT EVALUATION , 1995 .

[6]  R L BENNETT,et al.  Electromyography of fatigue. , 1951, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  A Grieco,et al.  Sitting posture: an old problem and a new one. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[8]  A Magora,et al.  Investigation of the relation between low back pain and occupation. 3. Physical requirements: sitting, standing and weight lifting. , 1972, IMS, Industrial medicine and surgery.

[9]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  The Relationship Between Work History, Work Environment and Low-Back Pain in Men , 1984, Spine.

[10]  Kurt Jørgensen,et al.  Electromyography and fatigue during prolonged, low-level static contractions , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  A Magora,et al.  Investigation of the relation between low back pain and occupation. , 1970, IMS, Industrial medicine and surgery.

[12]  G. Elfström,et al.  Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting. I. Studies on an experimental chair. , 1974, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Physiological and Psychological Evaluations of Driver Fatigue During Long Term Driving , 1991 .

[14]  R. Ortengren,et al.  Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting. II. Studies on an office chair. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  S. Simon,et al.  Myoelectric Analysis of the Paraspinal Musculature in Relation to Automobile Driving , 1986, Spine.

[16]  G. Andersson.  Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in Industry , 1981, Spine.

[17]  R Ortengren,et al.  Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting. 3. Studies on a wheelchair. , 1974, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  J. J. Keegan,et al.  Alterations of the lumbar curve related to posture and seating. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  J. Kelsey.  An epidemiological study of the relationship between occupations and acute herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. , 1975, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  M. Lamontagne,et al.  Comparisons between surface electrodes and intramuscular wire electrodes in isometric and dynamic conditions. , 1990, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.