Web-HIPRE - Global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Gregory E. Kersten,et al. Negotiation via the World Wide Web: A Cross-cultural Study of Decision Making , 1999 .
[2] R. Hämäläinen,et al. Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .
[3] Raimo P. Hmlinen,et al. On-line group decision support by preference programming in traffic planning , 1996 .
[4] Ahti Salo. Inconsistency analysis by approximately specified priorities , 1993 .
[5] Ernest H. Forman,et al. Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..
[6] J. Dyer. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .
[7] Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al. Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements , 1992, Oper. Res..
[8] Ward Edwards,et al. How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[9] W. Edwards,et al. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .
[10] T. Saaty. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .
[11] John B. Kidd,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .
[12] James S. Dyer,et al. A clarification of “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .
[13] Simon French,et al. Problem formulation for multi-criteria decision analysis: Report of a workshop , 1998 .
[14] R. Hämäläinen,et al. On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process , 1997 .
[15] Hans Vrolijk,et al. Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[16] R. Ramanathan,et al. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages , 1994 .
[17] R. Hämäläinen,et al. An Experiment on the Numerical Modelling of Verbal Ratio Statements , 1997 .
[18] Ahti Salo,et al. Interactive decision aiding for group decision support , 1995 .
[19] F. B. Vernadat,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .
[20] F. H. Barron,et al. SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .
[21] T. Saaty,et al. Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .
[22] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[23] R.P. Hamalainen,et al. Observations about consensus seeking in a multiple criteria environment , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[24] Thomas L. Saaty,et al. That is not the analytic hierarchy process: what the AHP is and what it is not , 1997 .
[25] Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al. There Is Hope In Attribute Weighting , 2000 .
[26] Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al. On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[27] Harri Ehtamo,et al. Towards decision and negotiation support in multi-stakeholder development of lake regulation policy , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.
[28] R. Hämäläinen,et al. PRIME - Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation , 1992 .
[29] R. L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.