First experience of autonomous, un-supervised treatment planning integrated in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy and delivered to a patient with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Currently clinical radiotherapy (RT) planning consists of a multi-step routine procedure requiring human interaction which often results in a time-consuming and fragmented process with limited robustness. Here we present an autonomous un-supervised treatment planning approach, integrated as basis for online adaptive magnetic resonance guided RT (MRgRT), which was delivered to a prostate cancer patient as a first-in-human experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS For an intermediate risk prostate cancer patient OARs and targets were automatically segmented using a deep learning-based software and logical volume operators. A baseline plan for the 1.5T MR-Linac (20x3Gy) was automatically generated using particle swarm optimization (PSO) without any human interaction. Plan quality was evaluated by predefined dosimetric criteria including appropriate tolerances. Online plan adaptation during clinical MRgRT was defined as first checkpoint for human interaction. RESULTS OARs and targets were successfully segmented (3 min) and used for automatic plan optimization (300 min). The autonomous generated plan satisfied 12/16 dosimetric criteria, however all remained within tolerance. Without prior human validation, this baseline plan was successfully used during online MRgRT plan adaptation, where 14/16 criteria were fulfilled. As postulated, human interaction was necessary only during plan adaptation. CONCLUSION Autonomous, un-supervised data preparation and treatment planning was first-in-human shown to be feasible for adaptive MRgRT and successfully applied. The checkpoint for first human intervention was at the time of online MRgRT plan adaptation. Autonomous planning reduced the time delay between simulation and start of RT and may thus allow for real-time MRgRT applications in the future.

[1]  Charlotte L. Brouwer,et al.  Machine learning applications in radiation oncology: Current use and needs to support clinical implementation , 2020, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[2]  Annie Gao,et al.  Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  Carsten Brink,et al.  Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans. , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  T. Davenport,et al.  The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare , 2019, Future Healthcare Journal.

[5]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  David A Jaffray,et al.  The transformation of radiation oncology using real-time magnetic resonance guidance: A review. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[7]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  The role of computational methods for automating and improving clinical target volume definition. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  D. Mönnich,et al.  Quality assurance of IMRT treatment plans for a 1.5 T MR-linac using a 2D ionization chamber array and a static solid phantom , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  James Wheeler,et al.  Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[10]  G. G. Sikkes,et al.  Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer; feasibility of the workflow on a 1.5T MR-linac; clinical implementation and initial experience. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Gilmer Valdes,et al.  Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: A specialty-wide disruptive transformation? , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Paul Aljabar,et al.  Clinical evaluation of atlas and deep learning based automatic contouring for lung cancer. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Jiawei Fan,et al.  Automatic treatment planning based on three‐dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique , 2018, Medical physics.

[14]  A. Gladwish,et al.  Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas based auto-contouring of bladder and rectum for prostate radiotherapy. , 2020, Practical radiation oncology.

[15]  Yonggang Lu,et al.  A novel MRI segmentation method using CNN‐based correction network for MRI‐guided adaptive radiotherapy , 2018, Medical physics.

[16]  Nalee Kim,et al.  Clinical evaluation of atlas- and deep learning-based automatic segmentation of multiple organs and clinical target volumes for breast cancer. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  L. Livi,et al.  Partial breast irradiation with the 1.5 T MR-Linac: First patient treatment and analysis of electron return and stream effects. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Daniela Thorwarth,et al.  Automatic VMAT planning for post-operative prostate cancer cases using particle swarm optimization: A proof of concept study. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[19]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Jiazhou Wang,et al.  An Artificial Intelligence-Based Full-Process Solution for Radiotherapy: A Proof of Concept Study on Rectal Cancer , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[21]  S. Korreman,et al.  The changing role of radiation oncology professionals in a world of AI – Just jobs lost – Or a solution to the under-provision of radiotherapy? , 2020, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[22]  D. Low,et al.  Technical Challenges of Real-Time Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[23]  D. Georg,et al.  Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy , 2017, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[24]  Wouter van Elmpt,et al.  Overview of artificial intelligence-based applications in radiotherapy: Recommendations for implementation and quality assurance. , 2020 .

[25]  Harini Veeraraghavan,et al.  Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of targets and organs-at-risk for magnetic resonance imaging only planning of prostate radiotherapy , 2019, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[26]  Mark H. F. Savenije,et al.  Clinical implementation of MRI-based organs-at-risk auto-segmentation with convolutional networks for prostate radiotherapy , 2020, Radiation Oncology.

[27]  Iori Sumida,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimized plans in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[28]  Zhikai Liu,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Auto-delineation of Clinical Target Volume and Organs at Risk in Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  Rob H.N. Tijssen,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept , 2019, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[30]  J. Jonsson,et al.  The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy , 2019, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.