The power few: experimental criminology and the reduction of harm

The promise of experimental criminology is finding ways to reduce harm from crime and injustice. The problem of experimental criminology is that so few experiments produce evidence of big effects from the interventions they test. One solution to this problem may be concentrating scarce resources for experiments on the “power few:” the small percentage of places, victims, offenders, police officers or other units in any distribution of crime or injustice which produces the greatest amount of harm. By increasing the homogeneity and base rates of the samples enrolled in each experiment, the power few hypothesis predicts increased statistical power to detect program effects. With greater investment of resources, and possibly less variant responses to greater dosages of intervention—especially interventions of support, as distinct from punishment—we may also increase our chances of finding politically acceptable interventions that will work.

[1]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  M. Wolfgang,et al.  Delinquency in a birth cohort , 1972 .

[5]  Christine E. Bose,et al.  THE SERIOUSNESS OF CRIMES: NORMATIVE STRUCTURE AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES* , 1974 .

[6]  Joan McCord,et al.  A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. , 1978 .

[7]  B. Forst What Happens After Arrest? A Court Perspective of Police Operations in the District of Columbia. , 1978 .

[8]  J. Archer Suffer the Children: The Story of Thalidomide , 1979 .

[9]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice , 1983, Crime and Justice.

[10]  Marvin E. Wolfgang,et al.  The National Survey of Crime Severity , 1985 .

[11]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  SELECTIVE APPREHENSION: A POLICE STRATEGY FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS* , 1986 .

[12]  G. D. Gottfredson PEER GROUP INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK OF DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR: A SELECTIVE REVIEW AND A NEW EVALUATION* , 1987 .

[13]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[14]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[15]  A. Hill,et al.  Suspended judgment. Memories of the British Streptomycin Trial in Tuberculosis. The first randomized clinical trial. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  Jane S. Smith,et al.  Patenting the Sun: Polio and the Salk Vaccine , 1990 .

[17]  P. Ebener,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of the Phoenix Repeat Offender Program , 1991 .

[18]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  The Deterrent Effect of Arrest in Incidents of Domestic Violence: A Bayesian Analysis of Four Field Experiments , 1992 .

[19]  Edwin E. Hamilton,et al.  Formal and Informal Deterrents to Domestic Violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment , 1992 .

[20]  Janell D. Schmidt,et al.  Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. , 1992 .

[21]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Attacking Crime: Police and Crime Control , 1992, Crime and Justice.

[22]  Gail Mason,et al.  Design Sensitivity in Criminal Justice Experiments , 1993, Crime and Justice.

[23]  Graham Farrell,et al.  Preventing Repeat Victimization , 1995, Crime and Justice.

[24]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial , 1995 .

[25]  R Doll,et al.  Controlled trials: the 1948 watershed , 1998, BMJ.

[26]  C. Henderson,et al.  Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children's criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[27]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Research in Brief. National Institute of Justice. , 1998 .

[28]  R. Tremblay,et al.  DOES PRESCHOOL HELP PREVENT DELINQUENCY IN BOYS WITH A HISTORY OF PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[29]  L. Sherman Reducing Incarceration Rates: The Promise of Experimental Criminology , 2000 .

[30]  L. Sherman,et al.  RECIDIVISM PATTERNS IN THE CANBERRA REINTEGRATIVE SHAMING EXPERIMENTS (RISE) , 2000 .

[31]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation , 2001 .

[32]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime , 2001 .

[33]  Lynette Feder,et al.  A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The broward experiment , 2002 .

[34]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations , 2003 .

[35]  J. McCord,et al.  Cures That Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs , 2003 .

[36]  David Weisburd,et al.  When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work”? , 2003 .

[37]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  Studying the Characteristics of Arrest Frequency among Paroled Youthful Offenders , 2004 .

[38]  J. Barry,et al.  The great influenza : the epic story of the deadliest plague in history , 2004 .

[39]  S. Bushway,et al.  Trajectories of Crime at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle , 2004 .

[40]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment , 2005 .

[41]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Randomized experiments in criminology: What have we learned in the last two decades? , 2005 .

[42]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Key longitudinal-experimental studies in criminology , 2006 .

[43]  L. Sherman “To develop and test:” The inventive difference between evaluation and experimentation , 2006 .

[44]  The Challenge of Crime: Rethinking Our Response , 2006 .

[45]  L. Sherman,et al.  Restorative justice: the evidence , 2007 .

[46]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Risky Facilities: Crime Concentration in Homogeneous Sets of Establishments and Facilities , 2007 .

[47]  Steven Johnson,et al.  The ghost map : the story of London's most terrifying epidemic--and how it changed science, cities, and the modern world , 2007 .

[48]  R. Berk,et al.  Forecasting murder within a population of probationers and parolees: a high stakes application of statistical learning , 2009 .