Perceived Versus Actual Ability to Identify Fake News: Evidence From Israel’s 2019–2020 Elections

A less studied topic about fake news is the gap between the perceived and actual ability to identify it. This study examines the topic using a panel survey during Israel’s 2019– 2020 election campaigns (Wave 1—N = 1,427; Wave 2—N = 758). Our research, which measured participants’ perceived ability to identify fake news during the April 2019 elections and their actual ability to do so during the September 2019 elections, allowed us to measure the gap between the two. Our analysis reveals that although various political and media variables predict citizens’ perceived ability to identify fake news, most of those indicators are not useful in explaining their actual ability to do so. The gap between the two is explained by political interest and exposure to diverse sources. In addition, we examine the Dunning-Kruger effect, focusing on the overestimation versus the underestimation of fake news identification. The findings indicate that the high political interest and knowledge, alongside high news exposure from diverse sources, leads people to feel complacent and fails people in fake news identification.

[1]  Edson C. Tandoc Jr.,et al.  Uninformed and Misinformed: Advancing a Theoretical Model for Social Media News Use and Political Knowledge , 2023, Digital Journalism.

[2]  Imelda B. Deinla,et al.  The link between fake news susceptibility and political polarization of the youth in the Philippines , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  C. Beauvais Fake news: Why do we believe it? , 2022, Joint bone spine.

[4]  Samia Benaissa Pedriza,et al.  Sources, Channels and Strategies of Disinformation in the 2020 US Election: Social Networks, Traditional Media and Political Candidates , 2021, Journalism and Media.

[5]  Bahrul Hayat,et al.  Perceived Accuracy of Fake News on Social Media , 2021, 2021 9th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM).

[6]  S. Valenzuela,et al.  Rethinking the Virtuous Circle Hypothesis on Social Media: Subjective versus Objective Knowledge and Political Participation , 2021, Human Communication Research.

[7]  Fan Yang,et al.  Does news help us become knowledgeable or think we are knowledgeable? Examining a linkage of traditional and social media use with political knowledge , 2021 .

[8]  Tal Samuel-Azran,et al.  Not all undecided voters are alike: Evidence from an Israeli election , 2021, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Benjamin A. Lyons,et al.  Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  S. Littrell,et al.  The ‘bullshit blind spot’: The roles of overconfidence and perceived information processing in bullshit detection , 2021 .

[11]  Abbas Tarhini,et al.  An empirical approach to understanding users' fake news identification on social media , 2021, Online Inf. Rev..

[12]  Tsahi Hayat,et al.  Less critical and less informed: undecided voters’ media (dis)engagement during Israel’s April 2019 elections , 2021, Information, Communication & Society.

[13]  J. Baptista,et al.  Online disinformation on Facebook: the spread of fake news during the Portuguese 2019 election , 2020, Journal of Contemporary European Studies.

[14]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19 , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[15]  Saifuddin Ahmed,et al.  Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size , 2020, Telematics Informatics.

[16]  Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma,et al.  Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Haifeng Huang,et al.  When “Fake News” Becomes Real: The Consequences of False Government Denials in an Authoritarian Country , 2020 .

[18]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Overconfidently underthinking: narcissism negatively predicts cognitive reflection , 2020, Thinking & Reasoning.

[19]  Benjamin A. Lyons,et al.  A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Tyran,et al.  Fake News, Voter Overconfidence, and the Quality of Democratic Choice , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  Moreno Mancosu,et al.  The Impact of Political Sophistication and Motivated Reasoning on Misinformation , 2020 .

[22]  Z. Chen,et al.  The Influence of Presumed Fake News Influence: Examining Public Support for Corporate Corrective Response, Media Literacy Interventions, and Governmental Regulation , 2020, What IS News?.

[23]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  What types of COVID-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots? , 2020, First Monday.

[24]  A. Cooper,et al.  A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news. , 2020, Current opinion in psychology.

[25]  David G. Rand,et al.  Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. , 2020, Journal of personality.

[26]  Jessica M. Covert,et al.  In News We Trust?: Examining Credibility and Sharing Behaviors of Fake News , 2019, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society.

[27]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[28]  T. Lee The global rise of “fake news” and the threat to democratic elections in the USA , 2019, Public Administration and Policy.

[29]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.

[30]  Y. Baek,et al.  Fake News Should Be Regulated Because It Influences Both “Others” and “Me”: How and Why the Influence of Presumed Influence Model Should Be Extended , 2019, Mass Communication and Society.

[31]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  How informed are messaging app users about politics? A linkage of messaging app use and political knowledge and participation , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[32]  A. Hershkovitz,et al.  The role social cues play in mediating the effect of eWOM over purchasing intentions: An exploratory analysis among university students , 2018, Journal of Customer Behaviour.

[33]  A. Hershkovitz,et al.  The independent reinforcement effect: The role diverse social ties play in the credibility assessment process , 2018, Public understanding of science.

[34]  Ian G. Anson Partisanship, Political Knowledge, and the Dunning‐Kruger Effect , 2018 .

[35]  David G. Rand,et al.  Belief in Fake News Is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking , 2018, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

[36]  Jessica R. Collier,et al.  Priming and Fake News: The Effects of Elite Discourse on Evaluations of News Media , 2018, Mass Communication and Society.

[37]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Fake news and indifference to scientific fact: President Trump’s confused tweets on global warming, climate change and weather , 2018, Scientometrics.

[38]  David G. Rand,et al.  Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  CUNY Academic Works , 2022 .

[40]  Axel Gelfert Fake News: A Definition , 2018 .

[41]  S. Männistö,et al.  A comparison of measured versus self-reported anthropometrics for assessing obesity in adults: a literature review , 2018, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[42]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[43]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[44]  S. Mo Jang,et al.  Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Jay J. Van Bavel,et al.  The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Isabelle Augenstein,et al.  A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task , 2017, ArXiv.

[47]  D. Kahan Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition , 2017 .

[48]  Benjamin D. Horne,et al.  This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News , 2017, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

[49]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  S. Sismondo Post-truth? , 2017, Social studies of science.

[51]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[52]  Tal Samuel-Azran,et al.  Political information repertoires and political participation , 2016, New Media Soc..

[53]  Khalid Mahmood,et al.  Do People Overestimate Their Information Literacy Skills? A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence on the Dunning-Kruger Effect , 2016 .

[54]  Nicholas A. John,et al.  “I Don't like You Any More”: Facebook Unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza Conflict of 2014 , 2015 .

[55]  Angie L. Miller Investigating Social Desirability Bias in Student Self-Report Surveys , 2012 .

[56]  Jake Bowers,et al.  Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[57]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Modelling with LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated , 1994 .

[59]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[60]  P. Shukla,et al.  Analyzing Machine Learning Enabled Fake News Detection Techniques for Diversified Datasets , 2022 .

[61]  Sylvia M. Chan-Olmsted,et al.  The effect of news consumption on fake news efficacy , 2020 .

[62]  Ralph O. Mueller,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Back to Basics. Teacher's Corner , 1997 .

[63]  J. Klayman Varieties of Confirmation Bias , 1995 .