Earthquake early warning for earth dams: concepts and objectives

In the geotechnical field, the risk related to slope instabilities or collapse of geotechnical structures are increasingly being faced by early warning systems, capable of: (1) predicting the incipient collapse based on the interpretation of a continuous monitoring of the structure and (2) spreading alarm promptly to reduce people exposure. Compared with structural approaches, early warning systems have two important advantages: a faster, simpler and less expensive implementation and environmental compatibility. Past experience indicates that vulnerability of earth dams is generally low under both static and seismic loading conditions. In spite of this, earth dams are characterized by a high-risk level, due to the high exposure factor. Nowadays, the application of early warning systems to dams is fully supported by the technological progress achieved in the telecommunication field, since it is possible to install and automate recordings and transmission of all physical variables significant to check dam safety: accelerations, displacements, pore-water pressures, total stresses, seepage flows. A considerable lack still arises in the predictive models for interpreting monitoring data and providing indicators on dam safety soon after a strong earthquake. The present work illustrates the basic concepts of an earthquake early warning (EEW) system for earth dams and the main features that should characterize a predictive model to such a scope. An application to a real case is finally provided, enhancing the role played by each monitored physical variable for the aims of EEW.

[1]  Jean H. Prevost,et al.  Nonlinear seismic response analysis of earth dams , 1987 .

[2]  S. Sica,et al.  Prove in sito sulla diga del Camastra: tecniche sperimentali e risultati , 2008 .

[3]  L. Pagano,et al.  Actual and nominal pore water pressure distribution in earth dams , 2012 .

[4]  Arezou Modaressi,et al.  Influence of past loading history on the seismic response of earth dams , 2008 .

[5]  Luca Pagano,et al.  Interpreting Settlement Profiles of Earth Dams , 1998 .

[6]  S. Sica,et al.  Seismic behaviour of geotechnical structures , 2002 .

[7]  James L. Sherard,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing in Embankment Dams , 1985 .

[8]  Luca Pagano,et al.  Performance-Based Analysis of Earth Dams: Procedures and Application to a Sample Case , 2009 .

[9]  L. Pagano,et al.  A simple numerical procedure for timely prediction of precipitation-induced landslides in unsaturated pyroclastic soils , 2010 .

[10]  M. Kavvadas,et al.  Fully coupled dynamic analysis of an earth dam , 2011 .

[11]  Emilio Bilotta,et al.  Effect of ground-motion asynchronism on the equivalent acceleration of earth dams , 2010 .

[12]  Luca Pagano,et al.  Representativeness of measurements in the interpretation of earth dam behaviour , 2006 .

[13]  S. Sica,et al.  Seismic response of a zoned earth dam (case study) , 2012 .

[14]  R. Davidson An urban earthquake disaster risk index , 1997 .

[15]  Vincenzo Convertito,et al.  Influence of focal mechanism in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis , 2004 .

[16]  H B Seed,et al.  Considerations in the earthquake-resistant design of earth and rockfill dams , 1979 .

[17]  R. Dobry,et al.  Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response , 1991 .

[18]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Foreword to: Prospects and applications of Earthquake Early Warning for real-time earthquake engineering, risk management and loss mitigation , 2011 .

[19]  S. Sica,et al.  Interpretazione dei segnali sismici registrati sulla diga di Camastra , 2008 .

[20]  S. Rampello,et al.  Evaluation of the seismic response of a homogeneous earth dam , 2009 .