A robust methodology for in vivo T1 mapping

In this article, a robust methodology for in vivo T1 mapping is presented. The approach combines a gold standard scanning procedure with a novel fitting procedure. Fitting complex data to a five‐parameter model ensures accuracy and precision of the T1 estimation. A reduced‐dimension nonlinear least squares method is proposed. This method turns the complicated multi‐parameter minimization into a straightforward one‐dimensional search. As the range of possible T1 values is known, a global grid search can be used, ensuring that a global optimal solution is found. When only magnitude data are available, the algorithm is adapted to concurrently restore polarity. The performance of the new algorithm is demonstrated in simulations and phantom experiments. The new algorithm is as accurate and precise as the conventionally used Levenberg‐Marquardt algorithm but much faster. This gain in speed makes the use of the five‐parameter model viable. In addition, the new algorithm does not require initialization of the search parameters. Finally, the methodology is applied in vivo to conventional brain imaging and to skin imaging. T1 values are estimated for white matter and gray matter at 1.5 T and for dermis, hypodermis, and muscle at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Signals , 2009 .

[2]  C N Chen,et al.  The field dependence of NMR imaging. II. Arguments concerning an optimal field strength , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R B Buxton,et al.  Slice profile effects in adiabatic inversion: Application to multislice perfusion imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  M. Maier Quantitative MRI of the brain—measuring changes caused by disease , 2004 .

[5]  P. Kingsley,et al.  Methods of measuring spin-lattice ( T 1 ) relaxation times: an annotated bibliography , 1999 .

[6]  R Deichmann,et al.  T1 maps by K-space reduced snapshot-FLASH MRI. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  W E Reddick,et al.  Correction of errors caused by imperfect inversion pulses in MR imaging measurement of T1 relaxation times. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[9]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  The differentiation of pseudo-inverses and non-linear least squares problems whose variables separate , 1972, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[10]  T. Nelson,et al.  Temperature dependence of proton relaxation times in vitro. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Pulsed magnetization transfer imaging: evaluation of technique. , 1999, Radiology.

[12]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  Measuring the skin , 2011 .

[13]  C. Lewa,et al.  Temperature relationships of proton spin-lattice relaxation time T1 in biological tissues. , 1980, Bulletin du cancer.

[14]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[15]  O Jolivet,et al.  In vivo proton relaxation times analysis of the skin layers by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[16]  F David Doty,et al.  Radio frequency coil technology for small‐animal MRI , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  J R MacFall,et al.  Methodology for the measurement and analysis of relaxation times in proton imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  Graham Wright,et al.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D. Noll,et al.  Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[20]  George H. Weiss,et al.  A modified fast inversion-recovery technique for spin-lattice relaxation measurements☆ , 1980 .

[21]  T. Redpath Signal-to-noise ratio in MRI. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  I. Young,et al.  Variations in slice shape and absorption as artifacts in the determination of tissue parameters in NMR imaging , 1985, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  A. Crawley,et al.  A comparison of one‐shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  P. Tofts Quantitative MRI of the Brain , 2003 .

[25]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  In vivo high‐resolution magnetic resonance skin imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  P L Carson,et al.  Determination of sample time for T1 measurement , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Peter B Kingsley,et al.  Optimized precision of inversion‐recovery T1 measurements for constrained scan time , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  F. Wehrli,et al.  In vivo MR microscopy of the human skin , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  L. Drain,et al.  A Direct Method of Measuring Nuclear Spin-Lattice Relaxation Times , 1949 .

[31]  C. Ahn,et al.  A New Phase Correction Method in NMR Imaging Based on Autocorrelation and Histogram Analysis , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  G. Barker,et al.  Sources of variation in multi-centre brain MTR histogram studies: body-coil transmission eliminates inter-centre differences , 2006, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[33]  J. Haldar,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of T 1 Relaxation Parameters Using VARPRO , 2007 .

[34]  M O Leach,et al.  A simple method for the restoration of signal polarity in multi‐image inversion recovery sequences for measuring T1 , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  P. V. van Dijk,et al.  Restoration of Signal Polarity in a Set of Inversion Recovery NMR Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  E. Hahn,et al.  An Accurate Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Method for Measuring Spin-Lattice Relaxation Times , 1949 .

[37]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  George H. Weiss,et al.  The choice of optimal parameters for measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times. I. Mathematical formulation , 1980 .

[39]  M. S. Silver,et al.  Highly selective {π}/{2} and π pulse generation , 1984 .

[40]  Huanzhou Yu,et al.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.