An alternative approach for item response theory observed-score equating is described. The number- correct score distributions needed in equating are found by numerical integration over the theoretical or empiri cal distributions of examinees' traits. The item response theory true-score equating method and the observed- score equating method described by Lord, in which the number-correct score distributions are summed over a sample of trait estimates, are compared in a real test example. In a computer simulation, the observed-score equating methods based on numerical integration and summation were compared using data generated from standard normal and skewed populations. The method based on numerical integration was found to be less biased, especially at the two ends of the score distribu tion. This method can be implemented without the need to estimate trait level for individual examinees, and it is less computationally intensive than the method based on summation.
[1]
Some Formulas for Use with Bayesian Ability Estimates
,
1993
.
[2]
W. Alan Nicewander,et al.
Ability estimation for conventional tests
,
1993
.
[3]
Deborah J. Harris,et al.
A Study of Criteria Used in Equating
,
1993
.
[4]
R. Brennan,et al.
Linear Equating Models for the Common-item Nonequivalent-Populations Design
,
1987
.
[5]
Melvin R. Novick,et al.
Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability
,
1966
.
[6]
R. Brennan,et al.
Test equating : methods and practices
,
1995
.
[7]
Frederic M. Lord,et al.
Comparison of IRT True-Score and Equipercentile Observed-Score "Equatings"
,
1984
.
[8]
M. J. Kolen.
COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND ITEM RESPONSE THEORY METHODS FOR EQUATING TESTS
,
1981
.