Systems and people under pressure: the discharge process in an acute hospital.

AIMS To understand the perspective of hospital-based health professionals with regard to preparing patients for discharge from an acute hospital in England. BACKGROUND The hospital experience in England over recent years is characterised by increasing admission rates and decreasing length of stay. Legislation and policy initiatives have also focussed upon the need to reduce delayed discharges. Discharge preparation is known to be a complex intervention with multiple obstacles within and outside of the hospital setting. DESIGN Qualitative. METHODS Posters were displayed within a hospital asking health professionals to take part in a focus group. Maximum variation, in terms of job titles, was sought for within the sample. Focus groups were held in December 2006. Six senior members of staff divided into pairs to run them. All groups were taped and transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS Three focus groups were conducted, which involved 11 nurses, 15 allied health professionals, five social workers and one doctor. Analysis identified the following themes and sub themes: 1 Conflicting pressures on staff: Keeping patients in hospital vs. getting them out; Striving for flexibility within a system; A paucity of intermediary provision. 2 Casualties arising from conflicting pressures: Professionals losing their sense of professionalism; Patients being 'systematised'. CONCLUSIONS Pressures described during focus groups stemmed from five main sources: external targets placed upon the system, internal hospital inflexibility and poor communication, the dominance of the medical model of care, a desire to address the complex needs of individuals and a lack of community services. Staff felt themselves to be victims of these competing pressures and that many of the solutions were beyond their influence. Staff described the dehumanising effect of sometimes having to ignore patient concerns, wishes and choices. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Understanding of the pressures surrounding discharge could inform relevant service improvements.

[1]  Haddock Ks Collaborative discharge planning: nursing and social services. , 1994 .

[2]  T. Rustøen,et al.  Growing Up and Living With Cystic Fibrosis: Everyday Life and Encounters With the Health Care and Social Services—A Qualitative Study , 2003, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[3]  Rosemary Watts,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of discharge planning. , 2005, Nursing & health sciences.

[4]  J. Pethybridge How team working influences discharge planning from hospital: a study of four multi-disciplinary teams in an acute hospital in England , 2004, Journal of interprofessional care.

[5]  C. Webb,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN NURSING RESEARCH 2 Focus groups as a research method : a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research , 2001 .

[6]  S. Keeney,et al.  Discharge planning: an exploratory study. , 2000, Journal of clinical nursing.

[7]  M J Bull,et al.  Components of a proper hospital discharge for elders. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  D. Steinwachs,et al.  Evaluating social work discharge planning services for elderly people: access, complexity, and outcome. , 1992, Health & social work.

[9]  D. Hudson-Barr,et al.  Successful patient discharge. A comprehensive model of facilitators and barriers. , 1998, The Journal of nursing administration.

[10]  J. Larrabee,et al.  Discharge Planning Process: Applying a Model for Evidence‐based Practice , 2004, Journal of nursing care quality.

[11]  S. Brand Nurses' roles in discharge decision making in an adult high dependency unit. , 2006, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[12]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Discharge planning: "fooling ourselves?"--patient participation in conferences. , 2004, Journal of clinical nursing.

[13]  A. Atwal Nurses' perceptions of discharge planning in acute health care: a case study in one British teaching hospital. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  C. Clarke,et al.  Do Research Interviews Cause Distress or Interfere in Management? , 1998, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.