Early Acquisition of Verb Grammar and Lexical Development: Evidence from Periphrastic Constructions in French and Austrian German

This paper takes a functionalist approach to the acquisition of verb morphology in French and Austrian German. The development of periphrastic constructions using auxiliaries and modal verbs (compound past, modal constructions and analytic future) was examined in two French and two Austrian children’s spontaneous speech samples from the onset of production until 3;0. Crosslinguistic comparisons showed both similarities and differences in the development of periphrastic constructions (e.g., compound past was the first structure to emerge in French but not in Austrian German, analytic future was the last in both languages), suggesting an interplay between general cognitive and language-specific factors. In the four children, developmental analyses showed precursors, such as bare infinitives and past participles and preverbal fillers, which denote a gradual and continuous acquisition process. They also showed temporal relations between grammaticization and lexical production of verbs, which is an argument for the ‘critical lexical mass’ hypothesis and for interdependencies between lexical and grammatical developments. These analyses support a constructivist and interactive view of language acquisition.

[1]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  German children's productivity with tense morphology: the Perfekt (present perfect) , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[2]  A. Peters,et al.  Filler syllables: what is their status in emerging grammar? , 2001, Journal of child language.

[3]  M. Tomasello First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[4]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[6]  M. Tomasello Language is not an instinct , 1995 .

[7]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[8]  A. Aksu-Koç,et al.  The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense-aspect morphology: evidence from Turkish , 1998 .

[9]  M. Kilani-Schoch,et al.  Filler + Infinitive and Pre- and Protomorphology Demarcation in a French Acquisition Corpus , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The Handbook of Child Language , 1995 .

[11]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[12]  M. Kilani-Schoch,et al.  First verbs. On the way to mini-paradigms. , 2000 .

[13]  W. Dressler,et al.  On the demarcation of phases in early morphology acquisition in four languages , 1997 .

[14]  L'acquisition de la morphologie verbale en français et en allemand autrichien : II. L'épreuve des faits , 2001 .

[15]  E. Bates,et al.  Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  The origins of grammaticizable notions: beyond the individual mind , 2014 .

[17]  Stavros Skopeteas,et al.  Morphologie : ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung , 2000 .

[18]  Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al.  L'acquisition de la morphologie verbale à travers les langues , 2001 .

[19]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The emergence of language. , 1999 .

[20]  Soonja Choi,et al.  Verbs in early lexical and syntactic development in Korean , 1998 .

[21]  Roderick M. Chisholm Tense , 1981, Tense and Performance.

[22]  M. Tomasello The new psychology of language : cognitive and functional approaches to language structure , 1998 .

[23]  E. Bates,et al.  A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  M. Raijmakers Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[25]  D. Bassano,et al.  Early development of nouns and verbs in French: exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  K. Wexler Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .

[27]  E. Veneziano,et al.  The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[28]  D. Bassano,et al.  Developmental changes and variability in the early lexicon: a study of French children's naturalistic productions , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  E. Bates,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIES OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1995 .

[30]  Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al.  Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology , 1987 .

[31]  D. Slobin The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .