A note about insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Some listeners are insensitive to the direction of pure-tone frequency changes when the standard frequency is roved widely over trials, but less so when the standard frequency is fixed and trial-by-trial feedback is provided. The present experiment tested the hypothesis that fixing the standard frequency and providing feedback is advantageous for direction-impaired listeners because under these conditions the listeners can learn to respond correctly without genuinely perceiving frequency-change direction. This hypothesis was ruled out by the experiment. It appears instead that direction-impaired listeners find it difficult to ignore the irrelevant frequency changes introduced by roving.

[1]  Sygal Amitay,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  B. Moore Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Adrian Fourcin,et al.  Intonation processing in congenital amusia: discrimination, identification and imitation. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Moore Relation between the critical bandwidth and the frequency-difference limen. , 1974, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Isabelle Peretz,et al.  Characterization of deficits in pitch perception underlying 'tone deafness'. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Catherine Semal,et al.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.