Cervical phIGFBP‐1 in the evaluation of the risk of preterm delivery

Background. To evaluate the accuracy of the decidual phosphorylated isoform of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 in endocervical secretions to predict premature delivery in symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women. Methods. The study included 332 pregnant women: 109 symptomatic patients (study group) and 223 asymptomatic women (control group). For all women, qualitative and quantitative assessment of the decidual phosphorylated isoform of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 in endocervical secretions was carried out, but the quantitative assay was finally performed in 282 of 332. Student's test, the φ2 test, and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. Results. The phosphorylated insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 qualitative test was positive in 35 of 301 women (11.6%) and 11 (31.4%) of them delivered before 37 weeks; in the remaining 266 women with a negative test, there were 11 (4.7%) premature deliveries (relative risk=5.8; 95% CI=3.3–10.3). The mean values of quantitative phosphorylated isoform of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 were 56.9 µg/l (95% CI=40.7–73.1) in cases of a positive qualitative test and 6.1 µg/l (95% CI=4.0–8.3; p = 0.0001) in women with a negative result. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for phosphorylated isoform of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 test in symptomatic patients were 69.2%, 90.5%, 50%, and 95.6% respectively, while in the asymptomatic patients they were 22.2%, 91.8%, 11.8%, and 96% respectively. Conclusions. The phosphorylated isoform of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 in cervical secretions is a potential specific marker for preterm delivery occurring before 37 weeks. This test may have an important role in the management of women presenting with symptoms suggestive of preterm labour.

[1]  William McGuire,et al.  Epidemiology of preterm birth , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  V. Hiilesmaa,et al.  Insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein‐1 in cervical secretion as a predictor of preterm delivery , 2001, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  M. C. Terek,et al.  Value of cervical phosphorylated insulinlike growth factor binding protein-1 in the prediction of preterm labor. , 2004, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[4]  A. Ruokonen,et al.  Combination of cervical interleukin‐6 and ‐8, phosphorylated insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein‐1 and transvaginal cervical ultrasonography in assessment of the risk of preterm birth , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Assessment of Rapid Fetal Fibronectin in Predicting Preterm Delivery , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  M. Plebani,et al.  Biochemical markers for the prediction of spontaneous pre‐term birth , 2002, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  A. Gronowski,et al.  Accuracy of the rapid fetal fibronectin TLi system in predicting preterm delivery. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  K. Haram,et al.  Preterm delivery: an overview , 2003, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[9]  J. Paavonen,et al.  Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in cervix as a marker of infectious complications in pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Boulvain,et al.  PREDICTION OF PRETERM DELIVERY BY FETAL FIBRONECTIN: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  H. Zeyneloglu,et al.  New rapid bed‐side test to predict preterm delivery: phosphorylated insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 in cervical secretions , 2002, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  M. Dombrowski,et al.  The Preterm Prediction Study: toward a multiple-marker test for spontaneous preterm birth. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Alexandra Kaider,et al.  Fetal fibronectin—how useful is it in the prediction of preterm birth? , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  S. Leeson,et al.  Fibronectin: a predictor of preterm delivery? , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Value of fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm delivery for a low-risk population. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  L. Burmeister,et al.  Vaginal Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Cervical Digital Examination in Women at Risk of Early Delivery , 2001, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[17]  L Deligdisch,et al.  Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  W. Blum,et al.  Ontogeny of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1, −2, and −3: Quantitative Measurements by Radioimmunoassay in Human Fetal Serum , 1994, Pediatric Research.

[19]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[20]  E. Rutanen,et al.  Insulin-like growth factors in obstetrics , 2000, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[21]  Philip Owen Detection of fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm delivery in high risk asymptomatic pregnancies , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  J. Iams,et al.  Cervical Length and Preterm Labor , 2000, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  R. Creasy,et al.  Preterm birth prevention: where are we? , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.