Delay-aware green hybrid CRAN

As a potential candidate architecture for 5G systems, cloud radio access network (CRAN) enhances the system's capacity by centralizing the processing and coordination at the central cloud. However, this centralization imposes stringent bandwidth and delay requirements on the fronthaul segment of the network that connects the centralized baseband processing units (BBUs) to the radio units (RUs). Hence, hybrid CRAN is proposed to alleviate the fronthaul bandwidth requirement. The concept of hybrid CRAN supports the proposal of splitting/virtualizing the BBU functions processing between the central cloud (central office that has large processing capacity and efficiency) and the edge cloud (an aggregation node which is closer to the user, but usually has less efficiency in processing). In our previous work, we have studied the impact of different split points on the system's energy and fronthaul bandwidth consumption. In this study, we analyze the delay performance of the end user's request. We propose an end-to-end (from the central cloud to the end user) delay model (per user's request) for different function split points. In this model, different delay requirements enforce different function splits, hence affect the system's energy consumption. Therefore, we propose several research directions to incorporate the proposed delay model in the problem of minimizing energy and bandwidth consumption in the network. We found that the required function split decision, to achieve minimum delay, is significantly affected by the processing power efficiency ratio between processing units of edge cloud and central cloud. High processing efficiency ratio (≈1) leads to significant delay improvement when processing more base band functions at the edge cloud.

[1]  Lei Li,et al.  Recent Progress on C-RAN Centralization and Cloudification , 2014, IEEE Access.

[2]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Capacity and Delay Analysis of Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks (NG-PONs) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Matteo Artuso,et al.  Cloudification of mmwave-based and packet-based fronthaul for future heterogeneous mobile networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[4]  Björn Debaillie,et al.  A Flexible and Future-Proof Power Model for Cellular Base Stations , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[5]  Cicek Cavdar,et al.  Interplay of energy and bandwidth consumption in CRAN with optimal function split , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Henrik Lehrmann Christiansen,et al.  Synchronization challenges in packet-based Cloud-RAN fronthaul for mobile networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[7]  Mugen Peng,et al.  Resource Allocation Optimization for Delay-Sensitive Traffic in Fronthaul Constrained Cloud Radio Access Networks , 2014, IEEE Systems Journal.

[8]  Murat Uysal,et al.  Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Osvaldo Simeone,et al.  Uplink HARQ for Cloud RAN via Separation of Control and Data Planes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Henrik Lehrmann Christiansen,et al.  Evaluating C-RAN fronthaul functional splits in terms of network level energy and cost savings , 2016, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[11]  Shugong Xu,et al.  Statistical Multiplexing Gain Analysis of Heterogeneous Virtual Base Station Pools in Cloud Radio Access Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Thomas Pfeiffer,et al.  Next generation mobile fronthaul and midhaul architectures [Invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.