An Evaluation of the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainties in the IPCC Reports on Climate Change

Few global threats rival global climate change in scale and potential consequence. The principal international authority assessing climate risk is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Through repeated assessments the IPCC has devoted considerable effort and interdisciplinary competence to articulating a common characterization of climate risk and uncertainties. We have reviewed the assessment and its foundation for the Fifth Assessment Reports published in 2013 and 2014, in particular the guidance note for lead authors of the fifth IPCC assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Our analysis shows that the work carried out by the ICPP is short of providing a theoretically and conceptually convincing foundation on the treatment of risk and uncertainties. The main reasons for our assessment are: (i) the concept of risk is given a too narrow definition (a function of consequences and probability/likelihood); and (ii) the reports lack precision in delineating their concepts and methods. The goal of this article is to contribute to improving the handling of uncertainty and risk in future IPCC studies, thereby obtaining a more theoretically substantiated characterization as well as enhanced scientific quality for risk analysis in this area. Several suggestions for how to improve the risk and uncertainty treatment are provided.

[1]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Deep and Shallow Uncertainty in Messaging Climate Change , 2014 .

[2]  South Africa,et al.  Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability – IPCC WGII AR5 summary for policymakers , 2014 .

[3]  Terje Aven,et al.  A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the meaning of a black swan in a risk context , 2013 .

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  Practical implications of the new risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Uncertainty analysis comes to integrated assessment models for climate change…and conversely , 2013, Climatic Change.

[7]  Terje Aven,et al.  A risk concept applicable for both probabilistic and non-probabilistic perspectives , 2011 .

[8]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the ontological status of the concept of risk , 2011 .

[9]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Improving conveyance of uncertainties in the findings of the IPCC , 2011 .

[10]  Terje Aven,et al.  Interpretations of alternative uncertainty representations in a reliability and risk analysis context , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Terje Aven,et al.  A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[12]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  P. Dent.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (2nd edition) , 2010 .

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  T. Aven.  Misconceptions of Risk , 2010 .

[16]  D Warner North,et al.  Probability Theory and Consistent Reasoning , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representation, Propagation, and Decision Issues in Risk Analysis Under Incomplete Probabilistic Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  B J Garrick,et al.  Interval Analysis Versus Probabilistic Analysis , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  William A. Huber,et al.  Ignorance Is Not Probability , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  C. Haug,et al.  Exploring the future: The role of scenarios and policy exercises , 2010 .

[21]  Francis W. Zwiers,et al.  Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties , 2010 .

[22]  Martijn Gough.  Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[23]  Simon Buckle,et al.  Mitigation of climate change , 2009, The Daunting Climate Change.

[24]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[25]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[26]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Decision Making , 2009 .

[27]  T. Aven,et al.  EXPRESSING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY IN RELATION TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[28]  Arthur Petersen,et al.  Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC , 2009 .

[29]  Ortwin Renn.  Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[30]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Expressions of likelihood and confidence in the IPCC uncertainty assessment process , 2007 .

[31]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[32]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[33]  Martin R. Manning,et al.  The Treatment of Uncertainties in the Fourth IPCC Assessment Report , 2006 .

[34]  Y. Haimes.  Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management: Haimes/Risk Modeling, Assessment 2e , 2005 .

[35]  E. Rosa.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications , 2003 .

[36]  Terry Barker,et al.  Representing global climate change, adaptation and mitigation , 2003 .

[37]  Martin Manning,et al.  A Concept Paper for the AR4 Cross Cutting Theme: Uncertainties and Risk , 2003 .

[38]  E. Rosa.  Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[39]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[40]  H. D. De Kanter.  [The philosophy of statistics]. , 1972, Ginecología y Obstetricia de México.