Effect of calendering on paper surface micro-structure: A multi-scale analysis

Paper is a complex composite material. Its structure and surface greatly influence its end use properties. Calendering is a finishing process applied to paper to provide a shiny surface and to improve the smoothness. Hence, the control of the efficiency of calendering and the characterization of the final product necessitate the measure of the surface modification. Furthermore the relationship between the surface and the obtained level of gloss has to be further developed. The main purpose of this study is to describe the modification of the micro-structure at various scales of the paper surface due to the calendering process (under various processing conditions). The characterization of the paper surface was carried out thanks to an optical device allowing the topographic measurement to be taken at various scales. The equipment combines topographical imaging with a high definition camera, allowing measurement on the exact same area of the sample after each pass in the nip. We therefore introduce a new way to perform multi-scale analysis of the paper surface modification based on fractal theory.

[1]  Lars Mattsson,et al.  On the relation between surface texture and gloss of injection‐molded pigmented plastics , 2005 .

[2]  K J Stout,et al.  Development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions , 2000 .

[3]  Ø. Gregersen,et al.  Effect of temperature gradient multi-nip calendering on the structure of SC paper , 2004 .

[4]  R. Patrikar.  Modeling and simulation of surface roughness , 2004 .

[5]  R. Barrera,et al.  Surface correlation effects on gloss , 1998 .

[6]  B. Mandelbrot.  Self-Affine Fractals and Fractal Dimension , 1985 .

[7]  J. Bloch,et al.  Influence of paper structure on printability: Characterisation of paper using X-Ray Synchrotron Microtomography , 2006, NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference.

[8]  L. Ye,et al.  Analysis of Paper Gloss , 2006 .

[9]  Vladimir Litvinov,et al.  Modeling thickness and roughness reduction of paper in calendering , 2006 .

[10]  Jiunn-Jong Wu,et al.  Characterization of fractal surfaces , 2000 .

[11]  P. Beckmann,et al.  The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces , 1963 .

[12]  Gary Chinga,et al.  Structure characterisation of pigment coating layer on paper by scanning electron microscopy and image analysis , 2002 .

[13]  J. Bennett,et al.  Effect of local microroughness on the gloss uniformity of printed paper surfaces. , 2000, Applied optics.

[14]  Kyriakos Porfyrakis,et al.  How Surface Topography Relates to Materials' Properties , 2002, Science.

[15]  X. Thibault,et al.  Microstructural Analysis of Paper Using Synchrotron X-ray Microtomography: Numerical Estimation of the Permeability and Effective Thermal Conductivity , 2008 .

[16]  Jean-Francis Bloch,et al.  Statistical analysis of paper surface microstructure: A multi-scale approach , 2008 .

[17]  G. Chinga.  A quadtree decomposition approach for surface assessment , 2006, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[18]  T. K. Chinmayanandam.  On the Specular Reflection from Rough Surfaces , 1919 .

[19]  E Marx,et al.  Light scattering from glossy coatings on paper. , 1991, Applied optics.

[20]  X. Thibault,et al.  Synchrotron X-ray Microtomography: A New Tool to Characterize the Interaction Between Paper and Toner , 2008 .

[21]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Roughness characteristic length scales of micro-machined surfaces: A multi-scale modelling , 2007 .

[22]  Henry J. Kent.  The fractal dimension of paper surface topography , 1991 .