Female preferences for temporal order of call components in the túngara frog: a Bayesian analysis

We employed a Bayesian statistical approach to examine female preferences in the Neotropical frog Physalaemus pustulosus for the temporal relationship of the two parts of the conspecific advertisement call. The male advertisement call consists of a 'whine', which is necessary for species recognition, followed immediately by one or more 'chucks', which make the whine more attractive to females. We conducted 42 two-choice experiments with a total of 840 individual tests to compare the attractiveness of a whine with a chuck in a variety of positions relative to the start of the whine against a normal whine or against a normal whine/chuck. Females have a bimodal preference function for chuck position. Chucks placed in a variety of positions after the whine (including the position of a chuck in a normal call) were generally as attractive as a normal whine/chuck. Chucks placed before the whine were generally more attractive than a whine alone, and in some positions as attractive as the normal whine/chuck. Chucks overlapping the end of the whine make the call more attractive than a whine alone, but not as attractive as a normal whine/chuck, while chucks overlapping an initial portion of the whine beginning 50 ms into it are ignored; previous work (Wilczynski et al. 1995, Animal Behaviour, 49, 911-929) indicates this region to be critical for species recognition. These results suggest that female P. pustulosus have preferences for the temporal relationship of the two parts of the conspecific male advertisement call that far exceed the vocal signals produced by males, and that male calls have evolved calls to exploit one peak of this function. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

[1]  M. Ryan,et al.  Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[2]  B. Sullivan.  Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). II. Female choice , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Auditory Tuning and Call Frequency Predict Population-Based Mating Preferences in the Cricket Frog, Acris crepitans , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[4]  B. Sullivan,et al.  Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  B. Sullivan.  Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei) I. Chorus organization , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  K. Wells.  The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  A. Basolo.  Female Preference Predates the Evolution of the Sword in Swordtail Fish , 1990, Science.

[8]  WALTER WILCZYNSKI,et al.  The processing of spectral cues by the call analysis system of the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[10]  P. Backwell,et al.  Call rate variability and female choice in the African frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1995 .

[11]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Simmons.  Masking patterns in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). I: Behavioral effects. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Kahneman.  Changing views of attention and automacy , 1984 .

[14]  M. Ryan,et al.  SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .

[16]  Peter Marler,et al.  The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. , 1990 .

[17]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  D. S. Tracy,et al.  Bayesian statistical inference in the paretian law , 1987 .

[19]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Nonlinear Properties of the Peripheral Auditory System of Anurans , 1980 .

[20]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The auditory system of anuran amphibians , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[21]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Conducting Playback Experiments and Interpreting their Results , 1992 .

[22]  日本音響学会,et al.  Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates , 1980, Proceedings in Life Sciences.

[23]  F. Hunter,et al.  Heterospecific mating preferences for a feather ornament in least auklets , 1998 .

[24]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[25]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[26]  M. Ryan,et al.  THE SENSORY BASIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION FOR COMPLEX CALLS IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS (SEXUAL SELECTION FOR SENSORY EXPLOITATION) , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  A M Simmons,et al.  Masking patterns in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). II: Physiological effects. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  M. Ryan,et al.  Signal Redundancy and Receiver Permissiveness in Acoustic Mate Recognition by the Tungara Frog, Physalaemus pustulosus , 1992 .

[29]  M. Ryan,et al.  Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses? , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog , 1965 .

[31]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Within-male variability in call properties and female preference in the grey treefrog , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  G. Uetz,et al.  Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  A. Treisman.  Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[34]  M. Ryan,et al.  Coevolution of Sender and Receiver: Effect on Local Mate Preferecnce in Cricket Frogs , 1988, Science.

[35]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  M. Ryan.  Sexual selection and communication in frogs. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  William E. Wagner,et al.  Asymmetries in Mating Preferences Between Species: Female Swordtails Prefer Heterospecific Males , 1987, Science.

[38]  Consistency of female choice in the túngara frog: a permissive preference for complex characters , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Orthopteran mating systems : sexual competition in a diverse group of insects , 1983 .

[40]  R. Capranica,et al.  Differential patterns of physiological masking in the anuran auditory nerve. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  M. Ryan.  The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication , 1986 .

[42]  Gudmund R. Iversen,et al.  Bayesian statistical inference , 1984 .