Tobacco industry strategies undermine government tax policy: evidence from commercial data

Objective Taxation equitably reduces smoking, the leading cause of health inequalities. The tobacco industry (TI) can, however, undermine the public health gains realised from tobacco taxation through its pricing strategies. This study aims to examine contemporary TI pricing strategies in the UK and implications for tobacco tax policy. Design Review of commercial literature and longitudinal analysis of tobacco sales and price data. Setting A high-income country with comprehensive tobacco control policies and high tobacco taxes (UK). Participants 2009 to 2015 Nielsen Scantrak electronic point of sale systems data. Main outcome measures Tobacco segmentation; monthly prices, sales volumes of and net revenue from roll-your-own (RYO) and factory-made (FM) cigarettes by segment; use of price-marking and pack sizes. Results The literature review and sales data concurred that both RYO and FM cigarettes were segmented by price. Despite regular tax increases, average real prices for the cheapest FM and RYO segments remained steady from 2013 while volumes grew. Low prices were maintained through reductions in the size of packs and price-marking. Each year, at the point the budget is implemented, the TI drops its revenue by up to 18 pence per pack, absorbing the tax increases (undershifting). Undershifting is most marked for the cheapest segments. Conclusions The TI currently uses a variety of strategies to keep tobacco cheap. The implementation of standardised packaging will prevent small pack sizes and price-marking but further changes in tax policy are needed to minimise the TI’s attempts to prevent sudden price increases.

[1]  Maxine Trump,et al.  Budget , 2018, The Documentary Filmmaker's Roadmap.

[2]  A. McNeill,et al.  Availability and Use of Cheap Tobacco in the United Kingdom 2002–2014: Findings From the International Tobacco Control Project , 2017, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[3]  T. Dewhirst Into the black: Marlboro brand architecture, packaging and marketing communication of relative harm , 2017, Tobacco Control.

[4]  C. Morley,et al.  Update on Performance in Tobacco Control: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Tobacco Control Policy and the US Adult Smoking Rate, 2011-2013 , 2016, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[5]  D. Kenkel,et al.  Cigarette Taxes and Older Adult Smoking: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study. , 2016, Health economics.

[6]  S. Greenland The Australian experience following plain packaging: the impact on tobacco branding. , 2016, Addiction.

[7]  M. Postma,et al.  Assesing The Net Fiscal Consequences Of Tobacco Use In A High Consumption And High Tobacco Tax Country: The Case Of Greece. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[8]  Doris G. Gammon,et al.  Internet cigarette vendors make tax-free claims and sell cigarettes cheaper than retail outlets , 2015, Tobacco Control.

[9]  J. Marti,et al.  Smaller Cigarette Pack as a Commitment to Smoke Less? Insights from Behavioral Economics , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  M. Thompson,et al.  Trends and socioeconomic differences in roll-your-own tobacco use: findings from the ITC Europe Surveys , 2015, Tobacco Control.

[11]  J. Kruger,et al.  The relation between tobacco taxes and youth and young adult smoking: what happened following the 2009 U.S. federal tax increase on cigarettes? , 2015, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  J. Britton,et al.  The relation between cigarette price and hand-rolling tobacco consumption in the UK: an ecological study , 2015, BMJ Open.

[13]  Ali Ajmal,et al.  Tobacco tax and the illicit trade in tobacco products in New Zealand , 2015, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[14]  Michael S. Amato,et al.  Higher price, fewer packs: evaluating a tobacco tax increase with cigarette sales data. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[15]  Victor U. Ekpu,et al.  The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence , 2015, Tobacco use insights.

[16]  A. Gilmore,et al.  Smoking patterns in Great Britain: the rise of cheap cigarette brands and roll your own (RYO) tobacco , 2014, Journal of public health.

[17]  Kevin Lane Keller Designing and implementing brand architecture strategies , 2014 .

[18]  A. Amos,et al.  Equity impact of European individual-level smoking cessation interventions to reduce smoking in adults: a systematic review. , 2014, European journal of public health.

[19]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Roll-your-own cigarettes in Europe: use, weight and implications for fiscal policies , 2014, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[20]  C. Fischbacher,et al.  Pricing Policies And Control of Tobacco in Europe (PPACTE) project: cross-national comparison of smoking prevalence in 18 European countries , 2014, European Journal of Cancer Prevention.

[21]  A. Gilmore,et al.  Tobacco industry manipulation of data on and press coverage of the illicit tobacco trade in the UK , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[22]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  Cigarette excise tax structure and cigarette prices: evidence from the global adult tobacco survey and the U.S. National Adult Tobacco Survey. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[23]  R. Peto,et al.  Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Shannon M Farley,et al.  Public opinions on tax and retail-based tobacco control strategies , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[25]  C. Saunders,et al.  Do consumers of manufactured cigarettes respond differently to price changes compared with their Roll-Your-Own counterparts? Evidence from New Zealand , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[26]  A. Amos,et al.  Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[27]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  The choice of discount brand cigarettes: a comparative analysis of International Tobacco Control surveys in Canada and the USA (2002–2005) , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[28]  D. Levy,et al.  Smoking-related deaths averted due to three years of policy progress. , 2013, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[29]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  The distribution of cigarette prices under different tax structures: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[30]  F. Chaloupka Maximizing the public health impact of alcohol and tobacco taxes. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  H. Reed,et al.  Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market , 2013, Addiction.

[32]  A. Gilmore,et al.  The case for Ofsmoke: the potential for price cap regulation of tobacco to raise £500 million per year in the UK , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[33]  Eamonn Molloy,et al.  Smoking initiation and the iron law of demand. , 2013, Journal of health economics.

[34]  D. Levy,et al.  The role of public policies in reducing smoking: the Minnesota SimSmoke tobacco policy model. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  Ephraim S. Leibtag,et al.  The Heterogeneous Geographic and Socioeconomic Incidence of Cigarette Taxes: Evidence from Nielsen Homescan Data † , 2012 .

[36]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews , 2012, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[37]  K. Ribisl,et al.  Impact of cigarette minimum price laws on the retail price of cigarettes in the USA , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[38]  Olaide A. Odelola,et al.  Impact of Tobacco Control Interventions on Smoking Initiation, Cessation, and Prevalence: A Systematic Review , 2012, Journal of environmental and public health.

[39]  E. Fernández,et al.  The Spanish tobacco tax loopholes and their consequences , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[40]  Carla J. Berg,et al.  Results of a Feasibility and Acceptability Trial of an Online Smoking Cessation Program Targeting Young Adult Nondaily Smokers , 2012, Journal of environmental and public health.

[41]  Lisa Henriksen,et al.  Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[42]  Kenneth Blackman,et al.  The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. Findings from the Netherlands SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model. , 2012, Addiction.

[43]  Consumer Price indices , 2018 .

[44]  R. Ferrence,et al.  Effects of Tobacco Taxation and Pricing on Smoking Behavior in High Risk Populations: A Knowledge Synthesis , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[45]  R. Haigh,et al.  A window of opportunity , 2011 .

[46]  K. Cummings,et al.  Predictors of what smokers say they will do in response to future price increases. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. , 2011, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[47]  K. Cummings,et al.  How Do Price Minimizing Behaviors Impact Smoking Cessation? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[48]  A. Hyland,et al.  Do cigarette prices motivate smokers to quit? New evidence from the ITC survey. , 2011, Addiction.

[49]  A. McNeill,et al.  Economic evaluation of the removal of tobacco promotional displays in Ireland , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[50]  Witold Zatonski,et al.  Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America , 2006, The Lancet.

[51]  L. Joossens,et al.  The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[52]  George Silver,et al.  WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY , 1988, The Lancet.

[53]  F. Limongelli Annual general meeting , 1921, Aeronautical journal (London, England : 1897).