Setting an egalitarian social norm in the classroom: improving attitudes towards diversity among male engineering students

This study tested the effect of a message describing a social norm of egalitarian attitudes and behaviors in an engineering college on male students’ attitudes and behavioral intentions surrounding diversity in engineering. Participants were first-semester university students enrolled in four sections of an introductory engineering course in two academic terms (Fall 2009 and Fall 2011). At the beginning of the semester, students in two of the four sections received the egalitarian social norms message in the form of an oral presentation given by a senior White male faculty member (social norms message condition). Students in the other two sections did not receive this presentation (control condition). At the end of the semester, all students were invited to complete a survey. Results from a sample of 129 students showed that compared to the control condition, male students in the social norms message condition had stronger intentions to speak out against racist behaviors in their engineering courses and teams, and (among White compared to racial minority men) more positive attitudes toward diversity in engineering. These results suggest that setting a tone of egalitarianism and intolerance of bias for incoming students could help create a more inclusive environment in a White male-dominated educational setting such as a college of engineering.

[1]  M. Levine,et al.  Beyond prejudice : extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change , 2011 .

[2]  R. Cialdini,et al.  New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements , 2000 .

[3]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Changing Implicit and Explicit Prejudice Insights from the Associative-Propositional Evaluation Model , 2010 .

[4]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination , 2010 .

[5]  Denise Sekaquaptewa,et al.  When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities , 2002 .

[6]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[7]  Alexander M. Czopp,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Confronting Prejudice (literally): Reactions to Confrontations of Racial and Gender Bias on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[8]  J. Gross,et al.  Signaling Threat , 2007, Psychological science.

[9]  Joseph R. Hopper,et al.  Recycling as Altruistic Behavior , 1991 .

[10]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Changing Racial Beliefs by Providing Consensus Information , 2001 .

[11]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The aversive form of racism. , 1986 .

[12]  G. Cowan,et al.  Judgments of Hate Speech: The Effects of Target Group, Publicness, and Behavioral Responses of the Target , 1996 .

[13]  E. Cole.  Intersectionality and research in psychology. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[14]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[15]  M. J. Monteith,et al.  Contents and correlates of whites' and blacks' racial attitudes , 2000 .

[16]  D. Vogel,et al.  Bias in the Classroom: Types, Frequencies, and Responses , 2009 .

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[18]  Brad J. Sagarin,et al.  Managing social norms for persuasive impact , 2006 .

[19]  Alexander M. Czopp,et al.  Putting the brakes on prejudice: on the development and operation of cues for control. , 2002 .

[20]  S. Ceci,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Sex Differences in Math-intensive Fields on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[21]  R. Steinpreis,et al.  The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study , 1999 .

[22]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[23]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[24]  R. Cialdini,et al.  The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements , 2000 .

[25]  Susan E. Walden,et al.  “Asians are Good at Math. What an Awful Stereotype” The Model Minority Stereotype's Impact on Asian American Engineering Students , 2012 .

[26]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations , 1987 .

[27]  S. Fiske,et al.  An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[28]  C. Crandall,et al.  Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism , 1986 .

[30]  S. Spencer,et al.  Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat , 2002 .

[31]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Consumer involvement, message attention, and the persistence of persuasive impact in a message‐dense environment , 1993 .

[32]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The transsituational influence of social norms. , 1993 .