Out of the Postmodern Abyss: Preserving the Rationale for Liberal Planning

The implications of the postmodernist challenge to planning are examined. Much of the postmodernist critique of modernism is valid, particularly its rejection of the scientistic tenet of modernism—the claim that science is the only source of valid knowledge-and the foundationalism and absolutism which flow from this. However, postmodernists show a dangerous inclination to reject the humanistic tenet of modernism—the valuing of the equal and autonomous individual in both political and moral realms-along with the core idea that progress comes via rational argument. Full-blown postmodernism1 is also fatally flawed by an inconsistent retention of the very foundationalism and absolute dualism which it purports to reject. The uncritical adoption of postmodernist assumptions could impair our ability to legitimate public planning. An alternative nonmodernist approachneopragmatism—offers a coherent and reasonable basis for justifying planning.

[1]  Edward C. Banfield,et al.  Politics, Planning and the Public Interest: The Case of Public Housing in Chicago. , 1955 .

[2]  L. Kattsoff.  Meaning of Scientific Terms , 1957 .

[3]  T. Kuhn,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Reflections on my Critics , 1970 .

[4]  Donald Davidson,et al.  On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme , 1973 .

[5]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests. , 1973 .

[6]  Ralph P. Hummel,et al.  The Bureaucratic Experience , 1977 .

[7]  Jean-François Lyotard,et al.  The Postmodern Condition , 1979 .

[8]  N. Lawson.  The New Conservatism , 1980 .

[9]  Michael Dear,et al.  Postmodernism and Planning , 1986 .

[10]  Linda C. Dalton,et al.  Why the Rational Paradigm Persists — The Resistance of Professional Education and Practice to Alternative Forms of Planning , 1986 .

[11]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[12]  Robert A. Beauregard,et al.  Between Modernity and Postmodernity: The Ambiguous Position of US Planning , 1989 .

[13]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[14]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity , 2020, The New Social Theory Reader.

[15]  John Friedmann,et al.  The dialectic of reason , 1989 .

[16]  C. Norris.  What's Wrong with Postmodernism : Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy , 1990 .

[17]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[18]  Robert A. Beauregard,et al.  Without a Net: Modernist Planning and the Postmodern Abyss , 1991 .

[19]  Helen Liggett.  Where They Don't Have to Take You In: The Representation of Homelessness in Public Policy , 1991 .

[20]  Beth Moore Milroy,et al.  Into Postmodern Weightlessness , 1991 .

[21]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Discourse Analysis and City Plans , 1991 .

[22]  C. Hoch.  The Paradox of Power in Planning Practice , 1992 .

[23]  P. Healey.  Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[24]  L. Groat.  Rescuing Architecture from the Cul-de-Sac , 1992 .

[25]  Stanley B. Stein.  Wittgenstein, Davidson, and the Myth of Incommensurability , 1993 .

[26]  John Forester,et al.  Learning from Practice Stories: The Priority of Practical Judgment , 1993 .

[27]  J. Friedmann.  Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning , 1993 .

[28]  Massimo Cellerino,et al.  The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity , 1993 .

[29]  Hilda Blanco,et al.  How to Think About Social Problems: American Pragmatism and the Idea of Planning , 1994 .

[30]  M. Ruse.  Struggle for the Soul of Science , 1994 .

[31]  Leonie Sandercock,et al.  Voices from the Borderlands: A Meditation on a Metaphor , 1995 .

[32]  J. Innes.  Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice , 1995 .

[33]  J. Friedmann.  Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action , 2020 .