The Impact of the Perimetric Measurement Scale, Sample Composition, and Statistical Method on the Structure-function Relationship in Glaucoma

PurposeTo investigate the impact of perimetric measurement scales, sample composition, and 2 statistical methods on the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. MethodsThree hundred eighty-five eyes of 385 participants, covering the full spectrum of the disease from healthy to advanced glaucoma, were tested with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and standard automated perimetry (Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm) within a 6-month period. The associations (R2) between neuroretinal rim area and perimetric data expressed in logarithmic (dB) and linear (1/Lambert) units were measured for linear and curvilinear (quadratic and logarithmic) models. The best-fit model resulting from 2 statistical analyses (χ2 coefficient and analysis of the residuals) were compared in the visual field areas corresponding to the 6 Heidelberg Retina Tomograph sectors and in the central visual field. These analyses were performed on the complete sample and on a subset of the study population composed only of healthy controls and patients with definite glaucoma. ResultsThe R2 values ranged from 0.01 to 0.32 with the strongest associations in the supero-temporal and infero-temporal optic disc regions. When perimetric data were expressed in dB units, the curvilinear models generally explained more variance than the linear model. When perimetric data were expressed in 1/Lambert units, differences were observed between the 2 statistical and subgroup analyses. ConclusionsThe perimetric measurement scale is one of many factors influencing the structure-function relationship. It is also influenced by the composition of the sample and by the statistical method of analysis. Expressing perimetric data in linear units does not always translate into linear structure-function relationships.

[1]  P A Sample,et al.  Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): II. Comparison of optic disk and visual field characteristics. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Airaksinen Pj,et al.  Neuroretinal rim area and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. , 1985 .

[4]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  William H Swanson,et al.  Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  H. Lemij,et al.  Relationships between standard automated perimetry, HRT confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and GDx VCC scanning laser polarimetry. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  J. Jonas,et al.  Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disk variables in the open-angle glaucomas. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Bourne,et al.  Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  S. Drance,et al.  Correlation Between the Visual Field Indices and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters , 1997, Journal of glaucoma.

[10]  G K Krieglstein,et al.  Quantitative morphologic and functional evaluation of the optic nerve head in chronic open-angle glaucoma. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  W. Green,et al.  Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  S M Drance,et al.  Psychovisual disturbances in glaucoma. A study of temporal and spatial summation. , 1974, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Neuroretinal rim area and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  A. Tuulonen,et al.  Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  J Flammer,et al.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Relationship of optic disc topography to optic nerve fiber number in glaucoma. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Optic Nerve Imaging: Recent Advances , 2004 .

[20]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Mapping structural damage of the optic disk to visual field defect in glaucoma. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  H. Quigley,et al.  Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Ronald S. Harwerth,et al.  Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma , 2002, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[23]  R. Anderson The psychophysics of glaucoma: Improving the structure/function relationship , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[24]  D. R. Anderson,et al.  The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 1980, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  G. Gamble,et al.  Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[26]  J. Piltz,et al.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. , 1990, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Cedric Ka-Fai Yiu,et al.  Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  Hans G Lemij,et al.  The relationship between standard automated perimetry and GDx VCC measurements. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  S M Drance,et al.  Features of the optic disc in preglaucomatous eyes. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  G. Holder,et al.  Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  G. Dunkelberger,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Scaling the structure--function relationship for clinical perimetry. , 2005, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[36]  M. Kass,et al.  Racial differences in optic disc topography: baseline results from the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[37]  W. Swanson,et al.  Development and evaluation of a linear staircase strategy for the measurement of perimetric sensitivity , 2006, Vision Research.