Effect of 3-Dimensional Versus Single-Plane Changes in Pelvic Dynamics on Range of Motion in Hips With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Computer Simulation Analysis

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is primarily caused by bony impingement between the acetabulum and femoral neck during hip motion. Increasing posterior pelvic tilt improves hip range of motion in patients with FAI. Purpose: To use computer simulation analysis to compare the effects of 3-dimensional (3D) changes in pelvic tilt (sagittal tilt [St], axial rotation, and coronal tilt) with changes in a single plane (St), with the aim of improving range of motion in patients with FAI. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: We evaluated 43 patients with FAI treated by arthroscopic cam resection. A 3D simulation was used to construct the following pelvic models: a 5° and 10° increase posteriorly in St (St5° and St10°) and a combined 5° change in St, axial rotation, and coronal tilt (Complex5°) from the baseline of the anterior pelvic plane. Improvements in maximum internal rotation (MIR) at 45°, 70°, and 90° of hip flexion and improvements in maximum flexion with no internal rotation were compared among the St5°, St10°, and Complex5° models. The pelvic models of each single-plane change of 5° and 10° were evaluated in the same simulation. Results: At 90° and 70°, there was a significant difference between the Complex5° and St10° models with respect to improvement in MIR (P = .004 at 90° of flexion; P = .017 at 70° of flexion). There was no significant difference in MIR at 45° of flexion (P = .71) or in maximum flexion (P = .42). Conclusion: At 70° and 90° of hip flexion, a combined change in 3D pelvic alignment of 5° (ie, St, axial rotation, and coronal tilt) was more effective in improving hip MIR than a 10° change in St only. Clinical Relevance: Effective physical therapy for FAI should address pelvic motion in all 3 planes rather than in a single plane.

[1]  M. Park,et al.  Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance , 2021, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  Y. Inaba,et al.  Effect of Decreasing the Anterior Pelvic Tilt on Range of Motion in Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Computer-Simulation Study , 2021, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Tomohito Komamura,et al.  Effects of trunk lean and foot lift exercises in sitting position on abdominal muscle activity and the contribution rate of transversus abdominis , 2020, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[4]  E. Garcia-Rey,et al.  Pelvic motion the key to understanding spine–hip interaction , 2020, EFORT open reviews.

[5]  K. Kaneoka,et al.  Activity of the Quadratus Lumborum and Trunk Muscles Relates to Pelvic Tilt Angle During Pelvic Tilt Exercises , 2020, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  Joshua D. Harris,et al.  Pelvic Tilt and Range of Motion in Hips With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. , 2020, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[7]  D. Whelan,et al.  Physiotherapy as an Initial Treatment Option for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis of 5 Randomized Controlled Trials , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  J. Karlsson,et al.  The effect of pelvic tilt and cam on hip range of motion in young elite skiers and nonathletes , 2018, Open access journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  The Relationship Between the Location of Uptake on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and the Impingement Point by Computer Simulation in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Cam Morphology. , 2018, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  P. Hodges,et al.  Trunk, pelvis and hip biomechanics in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Strategies for step ascent. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[11]  Dean Matsuda,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study. , 2017, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[12]  T. Masuda,et al.  Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics during activities of daily living: a cross-sectional study , 2017, Brazilian journal of physical therapy.

[13]  L. Pierannunzii Pelvic posture and kinematics in femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review , 2017, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[14]  K. Kaneoka,et al.  Analysis of muscle activity during active pelvic tilting in sagittal plane. , 2016, Physical therapy research.

[15]  O. Kwon,et al.  Effects of Motor Control Exercise Vs Muscle Stretching Exercise on Reducing Compensatory Lumbopelvic Motions and Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial. , 2016, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[16]  I. Zaltz,et al.  What Is the Impingement-free Range of Motion of the Asymptomatic Hip in Young Adult Males? , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  Jessica M. Deneweth,et al.  On-Ice Functional Assessment of an Elite Ice Hockey Goaltender After Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2015, Sports health.

[18]  J. Clohisy,et al.  What Is the Association Between Sports Participation and the Development of Proximal Femoral Cam Deformity? , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  B. Kelly,et al.  Functional Acetabular Orientation Varies Between Supine and Standing Radiographs: Implications for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  B. Kelly,et al.  Effect of Changes in Pelvic Tilt on Range of Motion to Impingement and Radiographic Parameters of Acetabular Morphologic Characteristics , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  M. Erdil,et al.  Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes. , 2013, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[22]  Robert F. LaPrade,et al.  Prevalence of Increased Alpha Angles as a Measure of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement in Youth Ice Hockey Players , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  N. Foster,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2013, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[24]  Klaus A. Siebenrock,et al.  Growth Plate Alteration Precedes Cam-type Deformity in Elite Basketball Players , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  D. Palmer,et al.  Midterm outcomes in patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement treated arthroscopically. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[26]  K. Briggs,et al.  Outcomes 2 to 5 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in the patient aged 11 to 16 years. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[27]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Clinical Outcomes Analysis of Conservative and Surgical Treatment of Patients With Clinical Indications of Prearthritic, Intra‐articular Hip Disorders , 2012, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[28]  Harrie Weinans,et al.  The Development of Cam-Type Deformity in Adolescent and Young Male Soccer Players , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  David J. Petron,et al.  Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: AAOS Exhibit Selection. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  K. Siebenrock,et al.  The Cam-type Deformity of the Proximal Femur Arises in Childhood in Response to Vigorous Sporting Activity , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  K. Emara,et al.  Conservative Treatment for Mild Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[32]  Shaw Bronner,et al.  Pelvis and Hip Three-Dimensional Kinematics in Grand Battement Movements , 2011, Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science.

[33]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Pelvifemoral kinematics while ascending single steps of different heights. , 2010, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[34]  O. Kwon,et al.  Effects of performing an abdominal drawing-in maneuver during prone hip extension exercises on hip and back extensor muscle activity and amount of anterior pelvic tilt. , 2007, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[35]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[36]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  S. Sakurai,et al.  Three-dimensional kinetic analysis of side-foot and instep soccer kicks. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[39]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  C. Powers,et al.  Sagittal plane pelvis motion influences transverse plane motion of the femur: Kinematic coupling at the hip joint. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[41]  R. Vaquero-Cristóbal,et al.  [THE EFFECTS OF THE PILATES METHOD ON HAMSTRING EXTENSIBILITY, PELVIC TILT AND TRUNK FLEXION]. , 2015, Nutricion hospitalaria.