Fragility Functions for Modern Reinforced-Concrete Beam-Column Joints

Fragility functions are developed to predict the method of repair required for modern reinforced-concrete beam-column building joints subjected to earthquake loading. These fragility functions, in combination with similar fragility functions developed previously for older joints, are used to compare damage progression in older versus modern joints. To develop fragility functions for modern joints, the results of previous experimental investigations are used to generate empirical relationships between damage and earthquake demand, damage states are linked deterministically with commonly employed methods of repair, and the empirical data are modeled using a standard probability distribution. The demand parameters, damage states, methods of repair, and probability distribution used in the current study are chosen to facilitate comparison with results from the previous study. The results of this study are a family of fragility functions that can be used to predict the method of repair required for a modern joint damaged due to earthquake loading and an improved understanding of the relative vulnerability of older versus modern components.

[1]  James O. Jirsa,et al.  Shear strength of R/C beam-column connections , 1983 .

[2]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[3]  Douglas D. Lee,et al.  Recommendations for Design of Beam-Column Connections in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures ACI 352 R-02 , 2002 .

[4]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[5]  R. Leon Shear Strength and Hysteretic Behavior of Interior Beam-Column Joints , 1990 .

[6]  K. Kazuhiro,et al.  Development of Design Criteria for RC Interior Beam-Column Joints , 1991, SP-123: Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance.

[7]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[8]  J. Jirsa Design of beam-column joints for seismic resistance , 1991 .

[9]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  On the Kuiper test for normality with mean and variance unknown , 1971 .

[10]  R. Park,et al.  A comparison of the behaviour of reinforced concrete beam-column joints designed for ductility and limited ductility , 1988 .

[11]  L. Lowes,et al.  Fragility Functions for Older Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints , 2006 .

[12]  Safaa Shaban Sayed Zaid Behavior of reinforced concrete beam-column connections under earthquake loading , 2001 .

[13]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers , 1970 .

[14]  J. F. Bonacci,et al.  Parametric Investigation of Joint Mechanics , 1993 .

[15]  James K. Wight,et al.  Experimental and analytical study of internal beam to column connections subjected to reversed cyclic loading , 1982 .

[16]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  CUMULATIVE SEISMIC DAMAGE OF CIRCULAR BRIDGE COLUMNS: BENCHMARK AND LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE TESTS , 1999 .