Impact of MicroRNA Levels, Target-Site Complementarity, and Cooperativity on Competing Endogenous RNA-Regulated Gene Expression

Summary Expression changes of competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) have been proposed to influence microRNA (miRNA) activity and thereby regulate other transcripts containing miRNA-binding sites. Here, we find that although miRNA levels define the extent of repression, they have little effect on the magnitude of the ceRNA expression change required to observe derepression. Canonical 6-nt sites, which typically mediate modest repression, can nonetheless compete for miRNA binding, with potency ∼20% of that observed for canonical 8-nt sites. In aggregate, low-affinity/background sites also contribute to competition. Sites with extensive additional complementarity can appear as more potent, but only because they induce miRNA degradation. Cooperative binding of proximal sites for the same or different miRNAs does increase potency. These results provide quantitative insights into the stoichiometric relationship between miRNAs and target abundance, target-site spacing, and affinity requirements for ceRNA-mediated gene regulation, and the unusual circumstances in which ceRNA-mediated gene regulation might be observed.

[1]  D. Bartel,et al.  Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs , 2014, Genome Biology.

[2]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[3]  L. Lim,et al.  MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[4]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[5]  M. Stoffel,et al.  Uptake and Function Studies of Maternal Milk-derived MicroRNAs* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Improved northern blot method for enhanced detection of small RNA , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[7]  I. MacRae,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Human Argonaute2 , 2012, Science.

[8]  Sean P Ryder,et al.  Argonaute protein identity and pairing geometry determine cooperativity in mammalian RNA silencing. , 2011, RNA.

[9]  Sebastian D. Mackowiak,et al.  Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency , 2013, Nature.

[10]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology , 2010, Nature.

[11]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Potent degradation of neuronal miRNAs induced by highly complementary targets , 2015, EMBO reports.

[12]  D. Bartel,et al.  Weak Seed-Pairing Stability and High Target-Site Abundance Decrease the Proficiency of lsy-6 and Other miRNAs , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  M. Zavolan,et al.  MicroRNA‐194 is a target of transcription factor 1 (Tcf1, HNF1α) in adult liver and controls expression of frizzled‐6 , 2012, Hepatology.

[14]  Ola Snøve,et al.  Distance constraints between microRNA target sites dictate efficacy and cooperativity , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Target RNA–Directed Trimming and Tailing of Small Silencing RNAs , 2010, Science.

[16]  Nahum Sonenberg,et al.  The mechanics of miRNA-mediated gene silencing: a look under the hood of miRISC , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  J. Kjems,et al.  Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges , 2013, Nature.

[18]  C. Sander,et al.  Target mRNA abundance dilutes microRNA and siRNA activity , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[19]  E. Izaurralde,et al.  Gene silencing by microRNAs: contributions of translational repression and mRNA decay , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  D. Bartel,et al.  Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs , 2015, eLife.

[21]  R. Sachidanandam,et al.  High-throughput assessment of microRNA activity and function using microRNA sensor and decoy libraries , 2012, Nature Methods.

[22]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Structural features of Argonaute–GW182 protein interactions , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  A ceRNA Hypothesis: The Rosetta Stone of a Hidden RNA Language? , 2011, Cell.

[24]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Model-guided quantitative analysis of microRNA-mediated regulation on competing endogenous RNAs using a synthetic gene circuit , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Margaret S. Ebert,et al.  MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells , 2007, Nature Methods.

[26]  D. Cacchiarelli,et al.  A Long Noncoding RNA Controls Muscle Differentiation by Functioning as a Competing Endogenous RNA , 2011, Cell.

[27]  R. Zecchina,et al.  Integrated transcriptional and competitive endogenous RNA networks are cross-regulated in permissive molecular environments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  M. Brady,et al.  PCB 126 and Other Dioxin-Like PCBs Specifically Suppress Hepatic PEPCK Expression via the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Single-cell level co-culture platform for intercellular communication. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[30]  D. Bartel.  MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions , 2009, Cell.

[31]  Vikram Agarwal,et al.  Assessing the ceRNA hypothesis with quantitative measurements of miRNA and target abundance. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[32]  M. Todesco,et al.  Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[33]  I. MacRae,et al.  A Dynamic Search Process Underlies MicroRNA Targeting , 2015, Cell.

[34]  Petar Glažar,et al.  Circular RNAs in the Mammalian Brain Are Highly Abundant, Conserved, and Dynamically Expressed. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[35]  Stefan L Ameres,et al.  Long-term, efficient inhibition of microRNA function in mice using rAAV vectors , 2012, Nature Methods.

[36]  M. Moore,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals that Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides , 2015, Cell.

[37]  N. Rajewsky,et al.  Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’ , 2005, Nature.

[38]  David G Hendrickson,et al.  Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Grace X. Y. Zheng,et al.  MicroRNAs can generate thresholds in target gene expression , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Nikolaus Rajewsky,et al.  Competition between target sites of regulators shapes post-transcriptional gene regulation , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  Debora S. Marks,et al.  MicroRNA control of protein expression noise , 2015, Science.

[42]  Thomas M. Keane,et al.  The BRAF Pseudogene Functions as a Competitive Endogenous RNA and Induces Lymphoma In Vivo , 2015, Cell.

[43]  E. Hall,et al.  The nature of biotechnology. , 1988, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[44]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  Zebrafish MiR-430 Promotes Deadenylation and Clearance of Maternal mRNAs , 2006, Science.

[45]  Phillip A Sharp,et al.  Endogenous miRNA and target concentrations determine susceptibility to potential ceRNA competition. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[46]  Phillip A Sharp,et al.  siRNAs can function as miRNAs , 2003 .