Comparison of four digital PCR platforms for accurate quantification of DNA copy number of a certified plasmid DNA reference material

Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is a unique approach to measurement of the absolute copy number of target DNA without using external standards. However, the comparability of different dPCR platforms with respect to measurement of DNA copy number must be addressed before dPCR can be classified fundamentally as an absolute quantification technique. The comparability of four dPCR platforms with respect to accuracy and measurement uncertainty was investigated by using a certified plasmid reference material. Plasmid conformation was found to have a significant effect on droplet-based dPCR (QX100 and RainDrop) not shared with chip-based QuantStudio 12k or BioMark. The relative uncertainty of partition volume was determined to be 0.7%, 0.8%, 2.3% and 2.9% for BioMark, QX100, QuantStudio 12k and RainDrop, respectively. The measurements of the certified pNIM-001 plasmid made using the four dPCR platforms were corrected for partition volume and closely consistent with the certified value within the expended uncertainty. This demonstrated that the four dPCR platforms are of comparable effectiveness in quantifying DNA copy number. These findings provide an independent assessment of this method of determining DNA copy number when using different dPCR platforms and underline important factors that should be taken into consideration in the design of dPCR experiments.

[1]  D. Link,et al.  Determining lower limits of detection of digital PCR assays for cancer-related gene mutations , 2014, Biomolecular detection and quantification.

[2]  Qun Zhong,et al.  Multiplex digital PCR: breaking the one target per color barrier of quantitative PCR. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Kerry R Emslie,et al.  Comparison of methods for accurate quantification of DNA mass concentration with traceability to the international system of units. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Philippe Corbisier,et al.  Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[5]  J. Silver,et al.  Nanoliter scale PCR with TaqMan detection. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Lianhua Dong,et al.  Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for characterizing plasmid reference material used for quantifying ammonia oxidizers and denitrifiers , 2014, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  Tak Y. Leung,et al.  Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S H Neoh,et al.  Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. , 1992, BioTechniques.

[9]  Ramesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Copy Number Variation in a DNA Sample Using Digital PCR on a Nanofluidic Device , 2008, PloS one.

[10]  Ie-Ming Shih,et al.  Principle and applications of digital PCR , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[11]  Stephen R Quake,et al.  Correction: Digital PCR provides sensitive and absolute calibration for high throughput sequencing , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[12]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Digital PCR. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Ramesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  Taking qPCR to a higher level: Analysis of CNV reveals the power of high throughput qPCR to enhance quantitative resolution. , 2010, Methods.

[14]  Lianhua Dong,et al.  Erratum to: Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for characterizing plasmid reference material used for quantifying ammonia oxidizers and denitrifiers , 2014, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[15]  Tania Nolan,et al.  The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  V. Beneš,et al.  Guidelines for Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments , 2013 .

[17]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Benjamin J. Hindson,et al.  Evaluation of a Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Format for DNA Copy Number Quantification , 2011, Analytical chemistry.