Effect of Pexelizumab, an Anti-C5 Complement Antibody, as Adjunctive Therapy to Fibrinolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The COMPlement inhibition in myocardial infarction treated with thromboLYtics (COMPLY) Trial

Background—Complement activation mediates myocardial damage that occurs during ischemia and reperfusion through multiple pathways. We performed 2 separate, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to determine the effects of pexelizumab (a novel C5 complement monoclonal antibody fragment) on infarct size in patients receiving reperfusion therapy: COMPlement inhibition in myocardial infarction treated with thromboLYtics (COMPLY) and COMplement inhibition in Myocardial infarction treated with Angioplasty (COMMA). The COMPLY trial is reported here. Methods and Results—Overall, 943 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (20% with isolated inferior MI) receiving fibrinolysis were randomly assigned <6 hours after symptom onset to placebo, pexelizumab 2.0-mg/kg bolus, or pexelizumab 2.0-mg/kg bolus plus 0.05 mg/kg per h for 20 hours. Infarct size determined by creatine kinase–MB area under the curve was the primary analysis, which included patients who received at least some study drug and fibrinolysis (n=920). The median infarct size did not differ by treatment (placebo, 5230; bolus, 4952; bolus plus infusion, 5557 [ng/mL] · h; bolus versus placebo, P =0.85; bolus plus infusion versus placebo, P =0.81), nor did the 90-day composite incidence of death, new or worsening congestive heart failure, shock, or stroke (placebo, 18.6%; bolus, 18.4%; bolus plus infusion, 19.7%). Pexelizumab inhibited complement for 4 hours with bolus-only dosing and for 20 to 24 hours with bolus-plus-infusion dosing, with no increase in infections. Conclusions—When used adjunctively with fibrinolysis, pexelizumab blocked complement activity but reduced neither infarct size by creatine kinase–MB assessment nor adverse clinical outcomes.

[1]  H. Wellens,et al.  Continuous 48-h C1-inhibitor treatment, following reperfusion therapy, in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, European heart journal.

[2]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of an Anti-CD18 Antibody in Conjunction With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Limitation of Myocardial Infarction Following Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (LIMIT AMI) Study , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  Assent investigators Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction , 2001, The Lancet.

[4]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial. , 2001 .

[5]  H. Pereira,et al.  Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Association Between White Blood Cell Count, Epicardial Blood Flow, Myocardial Perfusion, and Clinical Outcomes in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 10 Substudy , 2000, Circulation.

[7]  L Matis,et al.  Pharmacology and biological efficacy of a recombinant, humanized, single-chain antibody C5 complement inhibitor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1999, Circulation.

[8]  F. Werf Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[9]  E. Topol A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  L. Matis,et al.  Myocardial infarction and apoptosis after myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: role of the terminal complement components and inhibition by anti-C5 therapy. , 1998, Circulation.

[11]  S. Ogawa,et al.  C-reactive protein as a predictor of infarct expansion and cardiac rupture after a first Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  T. Investigators,et al.  A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction , 1997 .

[13]  L. Matis,et al.  Inhibition of complement activity by humanized anti-C5 antibody and single-chain Fv. , 1996, Molecular immunology.

[14]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Differential effects of tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase on infarct size and on rate of enzyme release: influence of early infarct related artery patency. The GUSTO Enzyme Substudy. , 1996, European heart journal.

[15]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Limitation of Infarct Size and Preservation of Left Ventricular Function After Primary Coronary Angioplast Compared With Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1994, Circulation.

[16]  E. Ohman,et al.  Temporal creatine kinase curves in acute myocardial infarction. Implications of a good empiric fit with the log-normal function. , 1993, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  J. Longhurst,et al.  Role of thromboxane A2 in the cardiovascular response to intracoronary C5a. , 1990, Circulation research.

[18]  M. Gawryl,et al.  Detection of the terminal complement complex in patient plasma following acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, Atherosclerosis.

[19]  H. Silverman,et al.  Relation between use of anti-inflammatory agents and left ventricular free wall rupture during acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Effects of early intracoronary streptokinase on infarct size estimated from cumulative enzyme release and on enzyme release rate: a randomized trial of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, American heart journal.

[21]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of short-term methylprednisolone on myocardial infarct extent, scar formation, and ventricular function. , 1983, Circulation.

[22]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Indomethacin–induced Scar Thinning After Experimental Myocardial Infarction , 1983, Circulation.

[23]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Scar thinning due to ibuprofen administration after experimental myocardial infarction. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  P. Grande,et al.  Acute myocardial infarct size estimated by serum CK-MB determinations: clinical accuracy and prognostic relevance utilizing a practical modification of the isoenzyme approach. , 1981, American heart journal.

[25]  L. McManus,et al.  Complement localization and mediation of ischemic injury in baboon myocardium. , 1980, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[26]  S. Effert,et al.  Infarct Size Estimated from Serial Serum Creatine Phosphokinase in Relation to Left Ventricular Hemodynamics , 1977, Circulation.

[27]  R. O'rourke,et al.  Consumption of classical complement components by heart subcellular membranes in vitro and in patients after acute myocardial infarction. , 1975, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  B. Sobel,et al.  Estimation of Infarct Size in Man and its Relation to Prognosis , 1972, Circulation.

[29]  G Barbash,et al.  Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[30]  I. Toda,et al.  The complement system in ischemic heart disease. , 1990, Circulation.

[31]  B. Magnani,et al.  The Role of Infarct Size in Early and Late Mortality , 1989, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[32]  L. F. Engebretsen,et al.  Acute phase reactants and complement activation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, Complement.