Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint

[1]  M. Faust,et al.  Sentence priming effects in the two cerebral hemispheres: influences of lexical relatedness, word order, and sentence anomaly , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Language processing: functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Bihemispheric sensitivity to sentence anomaly , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[7]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[8]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Debra Titone,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Context Sensitivity During Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , 1998, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. Faust,et al.  Levels of Sentence Constraint and Lexical Decision in the Two Hemispheres , 1998, Brain and Language.

[12]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[13]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[15]  D. Bub,et al.  Visual Word Activation in Pure Alexia , 1995, Brain and Language.

[16]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  M. Hoptman,et al.  How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact? , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[19]  C. Petten A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .

[20]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Hemisphericity and Top-Down Processing of Language , 1993, Brain and Language.

[21]  M. Beeman Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[23]  C. Burgess,et al.  Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places , 1990, Brain and Language.

[24]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication , 1989 .

[25]  M. Rugg,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[26]  H. Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.

[27]  J. Coney,et al.  The effect of retention interval upon hemispheric processes in recognition memory , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[29]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[30]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[31]  A. Milner,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to lateralised stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[32]  E. Shoben,et al.  The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. , 1985 .

[33]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[35]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  T. Sanocki,et al.  Contextual Validity and the Effects of Low-Constraint Sentence Contexts on Lexical Decisions , 1984 .

[37]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.

[40]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[41]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related potential studies of cerebral specialization during reading I. Studies of normal adults , 1982, Brain and Language.

[42]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[43]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[44]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[45]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[46]  R. Bailey,et al.  The computer and literary studies , 1974 .

[47]  H. L. Dee,et al.  Cerebral dominance and lateral differences in perception and memory. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[50]  Marie T. Banich,et al.  Interaction between the hemispheres and its implications for the processing capacity of the brain. , 2003 .

[51]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Parallel systems for processing language: Hemispheric complementarity in the normal brain. , 2003 .

[52]  Marie T. Banich,et al.  The Divided Visual Field Technique in Laterality and Interhemispheric Integration , 2003 .

[53]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  K. Baynes,et al.  The visual lexicon: Its access and organization in commissurotomy patients. , 1998 .

[55]  Mark Beeman,et al.  Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .

[56]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[57]  Nicoletta Berardi,et al.  Chapter 3 - Interhemispheric Transfer of Spatial and Temporal Frequency Information. , 1997 .

[58]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  9 – Missing the Point: The Role of the Right Hemisphere in the Processing of Complex Linguistic Materials1 , 1983 .