Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Faust,et al. Sentence priming effects in the two cerebral hemispheres: influences of lexical relatedness, word order, and sentence anomaly , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[2] Randi C. Martin,et al. Language processing: functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.
[3] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[4] C. Chiarello,et al. Bihemispheric sensitivity to sentence anomaly , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[5] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] D. A. Robertson,et al. Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.
[7] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .
[8] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[9] M. Kutas,et al. Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[10] Debra Titone,et al. Hemispheric Differences in Context Sensitivity During Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , 1998, Brain and Language.
[11] M. Faust,et al. Levels of Sentence Constraint and Lexical Decision in the Two Hemispheres , 1998, Brain and Language.
[12] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .
[13] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] S. Kravetz,et al. Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[15] D. Bub,et al. Visual Word Activation in Pure Alexia , 1995, Brain and Language.
[16] Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[17] M. Hoptman,et al. How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact? , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[18] S. Luck,et al. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.
[19] C. Petten. A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .
[20] S. Kravetz,et al. Hemisphericity and Top-Down Processing of Language , 1993, Brain and Language.
[21] M. Beeman. Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.
[22] M. Kutas,et al. Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.
[23] C. Burgess,et al. Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places , 1990, Brain and Language.
[24] Y. Joanette,et al. Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication , 1989 .
[25] M. Rugg,et al. Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. , 1989, Psychophysiology.
[26] H. Gardner,et al. Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.
[27] J. Coney,et al. The effect of retention interval upon hemispheric processes in recognition memory , 1988, Neuropsychologia.
[28] R. Ratcliff,et al. A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.
[29] C. Burgess,et al. Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.
[30] H. Gardner,et al. Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.
[31] A. Milner,et al. Visual evoked potentials to lateralised stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[32] E. Shoben,et al. The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. , 1985 .
[33] C. C. Wood,et al. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[34] R. Burchfield. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .
[35] S. Hillyard,et al. Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[36] T. Sanocki,et al. Contextual Validity and the Effects of Low-Constraint Sentence Contexts on Lexical Decisions , 1984 .
[37] M. Kutas,et al. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.
[38] M. Kutas,et al. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.
[39] Howard Gardner,et al. The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.
[40] Howard Gardner,et al. Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.
[41] M. Kutas,et al. Event-related potential studies of cerebral specialization during reading I. Studies of normal adults , 1982, Brain and Language.
[42] H. Gardner,et al. The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.
[43] I. Fischler,et al. Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[44] M. Kutas,et al. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.
[45] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[46] R. Bailey,et al. The computer and literary studies , 1974 .
[47] H. L. Dee,et al. Cerebral dominance and lateral differences in perception and memory. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.
[48] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[49] Wilson L. Taylor,et al. “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .
[50] Marie T. Banich,et al. Interaction between the hemispheres and its implications for the processing capacity of the brain. , 2003 .
[51] Christine Chiarello,et al. Parallel systems for processing language: Hemispheric complementarity in the normal brain. , 2003 .
[52] Marie T. Banich,et al. The Divided Visual Field Technique in Laterality and Interhemispheric Integration , 2003 .
[53] D. Shankweiler,et al. An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[54] K. Baynes,et al. The visual lexicon: Its access and organization in commissurotomy patients. , 1998 .
[55] Mark Beeman,et al. Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .
[56] Christine Chiarello,et al. Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .
[57] Nicoletta Berardi,et al. Chapter 3 - Interhemispheric Transfer of Spatial and Temporal Frequency Information. , 1997 .
[58] J. Grafman,et al. Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[59] 9 – Missing the Point: The Role of the Right Hemisphere in the Processing of Complex Linguistic Materials1 , 1983 .