Hybrid PET/MR Kernelised Expectation Maximisation Reconstruction for Improved Image-Derived Estimation of the Input Function from the Aorta of Rabbits

Positron emission tomography (PET) provides simple noninvasive imaging biomarkers for multiple human diseases which can be used to produce quantitative information from single static images or to monitor dynamic processes. Such kinetic studies often require the tracer input function (IF) to be measured but, in contrast to direct blood sampling, the image-derived input function (IDIF) provides a noninvasive alternative technique to estimate the IF. Accurate estimation can, in general, be challenging due to the partial volume effect (PVE), which is particularly important in preclinical work on small animals. The recently proposed hybrid kernelised ordered subsets expectation maximisation (HKEM) method has been shown to improve accuracy and contrast across a range of different datasets and count levels and can be used on PET/MR or PET/CT data. In this work, we apply the method with the purpose of providing accurate estimates of the aorta IDIF for rabbit PET studies. In addition, we proposed a method for the extraction of the aorta region of interest (ROI) using the MR and the HKEM image, to minimise the PVE within the rabbit aortic region—a method which can be directly transferred to the clinical setting. A realistic simulation study was performed with ten independent noise realisations while two, real data, rabbit datasets, acquired with the Biograph Siemens mMR PET/MR scanner, were also considered. For reference and comparison, the data were reconstructed using OSEM, OSEM with Gaussian postfilter and KEM, as well as HKEM. The results across the simulated datasets and different time frames show reduced PVE and accurate IDIF values for the proposed method, with 5% average bias (0.8% minimum and 16% maximum bias). Consistent results were obtained with the real datasets. The results of this study demonstrate that HKEM can be used to accurately estimate the IDIF in preclinical PET/MR studies, such as rabbit mMR data, as well as in clinical human studies. The proposed algorithm is made available as part of an open software library, and it can be used equally successfully on human or animal data acquired from a variety of PET/MR or PET/CT scanners.

[1]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Innovations in Small-Animal PET/MR Imaging Instrumentation. , 2016, PET clinics.

[2]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Multi‐modal synergistic PET and MR reconstruction using mutually weighted quadratic priors , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  MR-Guided Kernel EM Reconstruction for Reduced Dose PET Imaging , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[4]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Statistical Image Reconstruction for Shortened Dynamic PET Using a Dual Kernel Method , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[5]  Z. Fayad,et al.  Reproducibility of black blood dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in aortic plaques of atherosclerotic rabbits , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  V. Yaghmai,et al.  Performance of tumor growth kinetics as an imaging biomarker for response assessment in colorectal liver metastases: correlation with FDG PET , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[7]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Spatially Compact MR-Guided Kernel EM for PET Image Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[8]  R. Salem,et al.  Tumor growth kinetics versus RECIST to assess response to locoregional therapy in breast cancer liver metastases. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[9]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  N. Raje,et al.  Sodium fluoride PET imaging as a quantitative pharmacodynamic biomarker for bone homeostasis during anti-DKK1 therapy for multiple myeloma , 2017, Blood Cancer Journal.

[11]  J. Litton,et al.  Input function in PET brain studies using MR-defined arteries. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Fotis A. Kotasidis,et al.  Advanced kinetic modelling strategies: towards adoption in clinical PET imaging , 2014, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[14]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Use of the abdominal aorta for arterial input function determination in hepatic and renal PET studies. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Z. Fayad,et al.  18F-FDG:18F-NaF PET/MR multi-parametric imaging with kinetics-based bone segmentation for enhanced dual-tracer PET quantification , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[16]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Anatomically-aided PET reconstruction using the kernel method , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  M E Phelps,et al.  Correction of spillover radioactivities for estimation of the blood time-activity curve from the imaged LV chamber in cardiac dynamic FDG PET studies. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  S. Dadparvar,et al.  Association of vascular fluoride uptake with vascular calcification and coronary artery disease , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.

[21]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of normalisation factors for PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[22]  I. Poon,et al.  Effects of ROI Placement on PET-Based Assessment of Tumor Response to Therapy , 2013, International journal of molecular imaging.

[23]  Richard E Carson,et al.  Cerebral blood flow with [15O]water PET studies using an image-derived input function and MR-defined carotid centerlines , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  PET Imaging of Inflammation Biomarkers , 2013, Theranostics.

[25]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[26]  Michael Rabadi,et al.  Kernel Methods for Machine Learning , 2015 .

[27]  Robert G. Aykroyd,et al.  Hybrid PET-MR list-mode kernelized expectation maximization reconstruction for quantitative PET images of the carotid arteries , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[28]  Philip Novosad,et al.  MR-guided dynamic PET reconstruction with the kernel method and spectral temporal basis functions , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Comparison of NaF and FDG PET/CT for assessment of treatment response in castration-resistant prostate cancers with osseous metastases. , 2015, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[30]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Anatomical-image aided PET reconstruction by the kernel method , 2014 .

[31]  P. Marsden,et al.  Quantification of Skeletal Kinetic Indices in Paget's Disease Using Dynamic18F‐Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  M’hamed Bentourkia,et al.  Determination of the Input Function at the Entry of the Tissue of Interest and Its Impact on PET Kinetic Modeling Parameters , 2015, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[33]  M. Bentourkia,et al.  Segmentation and kinetic modeling of human arteries in PET/CT imaging , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[34]  Kernelised EM image reconstruction for dual-dataset PET studies , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[35]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Image-Derived Input Function for Human Brain Using High Resolution PET Imaging with [11C](R)-rolipram and [11C]PBR28 , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  Alex Smola,et al.  Kernel methods in machine learning , 2007, math/0701907.

[37]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Patlak Reconstruction From Dynamic PET Data Using the Kernel Method With MRI Information Based on Structural Similarity , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  P. Herrero,et al.  Measurement of input functions in rodents: challenges and solutions. , 2005, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[39]  Robert G. Aykroyd,et al.  Effect of PET-MR Inconsistency in the Kernel Image Reconstruction Method , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[40]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Comparative evaluation of scatter correction in 3D PET using different scatter-level approximations , 2011, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[41]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  S. Houshmand,et al.  Evolving Role of Molecular Imaging with 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET as a Biomarker for Calcium Metabolism , 2016, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[43]  C. Tsoumpas,et al.  Evaluation of the single scatter simulation algorithm implemented in the STIR library , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[44]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Image-Derived Input Function for Brain PET Studies: Many Challenges and Few Opportunities , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[45]  P. Marsden,et al.  18F‐fluoride PET as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for determining treatment efficacy of bone active agents at the hip: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[46]  Stuart A. Taylor,et al.  Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[47]  C. Tsoumpas,et al.  STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2 , 2012, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[48]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Optimizability of loglikelihoods for the estimation of detector efficiencies and singles rates in PET , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[49]  A. Alstrup,et al.  Kinetic Modelling of Infection Tracers [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-Citrate, [11C]Methionine, and [11C]Donepezil in a Porcine Osteomyelitis Model , 2017, Contrast media & molecular imaging.